Joined: June 2007
well hell i actually jumped off the wagon for that one. and man i'm glad i did, i'm overcome by the sticky tarden gold goodness of this, the sweet dark derp tarp of the hard tard, silent and completely dumb
but barry is what happens when you marry a lying liar chickenshit thug lawyer to the postmodern arm of the religious fundamentalists, the creationists
count the straw men
|One of our Darwinist friends’ favorite tactics is to insist that if something cannot be precisely quantified in mathematical terms then there is no warrant for believing it exists at all. |
"Darwinist"-- how retarded. But the fool intends to imply (i think) "materialist", which is even stupider. Barry confuses the idea of the throbbing penis for the throbbing penis itself, and that is the root of creationism in general.
"friends"-- when they aren't gay hitlers denying christ for allah. friends. FFS
"warrant"-- the root of their absurd epistemology is not about how we know things, as in "science", but how can they justify their faith to believe those things to be true, despite the evidence that they are false.
"it exists at all"-- again the idea of the hairy root mistaken for the hairy root itself. it would get old to party with barry i bet he would keep asking you to hand him that lite beer instead of a fucking lite beer all night long.
they seriously believe evolutionary biology deals with questions at the level of detail implied by "did a dinosar evolve to be a bullfrog then a chicken".
barry mischaracterizes things he doesn't even understand to begin with. what a maroon
|For example, ID proponents might point out that Mount Rushmore exhibits complex specified information (“CSI”). “How much CSI does Mount Rushmore exhibit?” a Darwinist might ask. “Oh, you can’t give me a figure? Then CSI obviously does not exist.”|
"ID proponents"-- no let's be honest the scenario you are describing is better captured instead by "incredibly stupid and/or dishonest people".
"point out"-- seriously, no "ID proponents" "point out" this shit ever. It's not "pointed out", it's claimed, and more accurately claimed on the basis of no evidence provided than an appeal to "emotion" or "common sense" which are categorically fallacious and cannot be true.
"exhibits complex specified information"-- let's be honest, you don't know what in the fuck this means. "exhibits" to who? Oh that's right everyone except "Darwinists" who are "without excuse". I see
"How much"--actually, much more is asked. "how do you know", "how do you measure it", "what are the units of measurement", "how does this measure vary among populations of samples", etc etc etc. but you don't give a fuck right barrry LOL lying for
"you can't give me a figure"-- not only that, we know 1) you can't in principle, b/c it's bullshit. 2) you can't in practice because YOU'RE TOO STUPID TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO IT YOURSELF 3) Your failure to provide a "figure" is not only a quantitative estimate but also even a verbal model of "CSI". There ain't nothing left in the sack hoss
"CSI obviously does not exist"-- give it a name and it must exist right what is this 900 bc? all anyone can say is that YOU have failed to demonstrate that your "CSI" is anything other than handwaving nonsense, because it ain't.
LOL u mad barry thats why you post this sorta bullshit aint it
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles