Joined: July 2006
|If the key cell-level mechanisms of life are based on FSCO/I and that is best explained per observation on design ó it is a reliable sign of it ó then it is part of the shift in balance on how we view FSCO/I across the world of life.|
Hey, Gordo, you keep saying "if" don't you? Why?
You talk about "reliable signs" not "certainty". You talk about "if" not "is".
Yet you'll then proclaim with absolute certainty that somebody else is wrong, that "islands of functionality" preclude evolution, but then can't make a coherent answer to pertinent questions other then to mumble "proteins, configuration space" and chant some numbers like a voodoo curse.
Let's look at your post.
Ah, your first mistake. Getting down that low in the barrel and shit is going to stick to you, no matter what. But let's face it, what choice do you have? Talking to BA77 is not an option is it?
|While I await the outcome of the no-confidence debate. |
Just like everybody else who had no influence in it what-so-ever.
|I think that, at least, the people can hear for themselves what is going on, and begin to realise what changes we will need to take the country and region forward.|
As long as they realise the right sort of change, yeah? Like keeping the gay people down, huh?
|You are right to highlight that the ability to carry out self-replication is indeed an instance of what has to be explained, FSCO/I.|
Then why don't you explain it?
Oh, what's that? You can't? You can't actually say anything about the origin of life at all except some dubious calculations about how improbable it is?
Lol @ you then, moron.
|Which is what Paley pointed out 206 years ago, long before the debates that strawmannised and lampooned him.|
Yes, even Paley knew about FSCO/I. The magic quantity that you can't calculate or otherwise use in any way what-so-ever.
|And, the truth is, the only empirically and analytically justified causal factor known to be adequate to cause FSCO/I, is intelligence.|
Is it? As a moment ago I had you down as an "if" or "reliable signs" type of guy? Now it's down to a single, certain cause?
What was that cause? What caused FSCO/I Gordo?
|One would have thought that at least the Anti-Evo habituees would have learned to do their homework before trotting out talking points.|
And lo! The pot speaketh, and it say: "Hey, kettle, look at all that soot on you!".
If you did your homework KF, you'd never speak again.
|But, yet again, they did not.|
They? You are only talking about me, who is they?
If "they" is everybody then you are obviously judging them by my words alone.
And yet you greet Joe in the first line of your post as a comrade in arms.
You are so far down in the dirt Gordon Mullings....
|And, we need not further underscore the basic lack of broughtupcy that seems to be so characteristic in places like Anti Evo. One hopes, they will wake up and clean up their act.|
Yeah, the place you can't stay away from, the place you read every fucking post on despite the fact it's such a disgusting swamp.
It never seems to work out so well for you Gordo when I come to yours. So why don't you try it over here? You might be surprised at the welcome you'd get!
|PS: The point here is that OOL cannot be separated from OO body plans or basic morphologies of life forms across the world of life.|
I'm going to have to put this in caps BUT GORDO, NEITHER ID NOR YOU CAN SAY ANYTHING ABOUT ANY OF THAT ANYWAY!
So regardless of your basic misunderstanding, which I believe to be deliberate, of conflating OOL and what comes after, what's your fucking point?
EXPLAIN SOMETHING THEN! IT'S YOUR TURN IDiot!
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand