Joined: July 2006
|Quote (didymos @ July 13 2010,12:56)|
|Very unusual for an ID/Creationist blog.|
My guess is that as ID/Creationists have a hard time when using metrics such as these for measuring success:
C) amount of ground breaking original research
D) amount of normal research on everyday stuff, filling in the details
F) Hypothesis construction
G) Hypothesis testing
H) Amount known about what they are criticising
I think they've taken to measuring success by number of page views*number of comments.
Corny should be using the number of defunct ID journals and the number of times the bible is mentioned on UD as his metric. Those numbers are guaranteed to increase.
Corny sees a graph on the control panel on his blog. The graph is on an upward trend. He shows this to others at his university. He wins.
What he does not see is the similar graph for UD that's now on a downward trend. Well, more of a downward trend then it was anyway. It's rate of decline has just increased.
BTW, how long is it before we can officially declare that http://bio-complexity.org is moribund?
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand