Joined: Mar. 2008
|Quote (OgreMkV @ July 08 2011,09:26)|
|Fresh Ph.D.* level TARD at Joe's house of ignorance.|
|Joe G said...|
Tiktaalik is a fish. No evidence to the contrary.
Archeopteryx is a bird. No evidence to the contrary.
And AGAIN that it has an alleged "mix" just says more about our classification schemme- meaning it ain't as neat as we like to think.
|I'd just like to remind Joe, that of 24 distinguishing features between birds and dinosaurs, Archeopteryx has 17 that are dinosaur characters (and not bird) and only 4 that are bird characters (and not dinosaur). The remainder are intermediate between dinosaur and bird.|
I'll also point out that, the formal definition of bird (it has feathers) is now wrong, as many obviously dinosaur species have feathers.
So, what is Archeoptyrex Joe? Is it a bird or a dinosaur? Why? What characters do you base this on? Why those and not others? We're going to need some detail here.
* Piled higher and Deeper
Ah - that pesky, pathetic level of detail again. Silly evilutionist - you should know better. He just needs to show that evilution can't explain everything, therefore he wins.
Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if he uses the same response he gave for the age of the Earth - he doesn't have enough verified information to tell - after all, we have no living dinosaurs to prove that our characteristics are correct.
"Just think if every species had a different genetic code We would have to eat other humans to survive.." : Joe G