Joined: Feb. 2006
|Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 11 2018,13:41)|
|Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Aug. 11 2018,08:13)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 11 2018,09:37)|
|Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 11 2018,09:33)|
|Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Aug. 11 2018,10:17)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 11 2018,08:31)|
|Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 10 2018,23:38)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 09 2018,18:20)|
|Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 09 2018,15:48)|
| I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night." -Joe G|
If "Joe" had made this statement to the professor in my first thermodynamics class back in 2002, Dr. H would have pulled him aside afterward to suggest he drop the class and pursue a different field of study that he may be more suited for.
How do you define the word "trap", asshole? That is what I would say to your professor as I was picking him up off of the ground.
If you're trying to explain Joe to your friends, they're likely to say "You must be exaggerating. No one could be that stupid AND that obnoxious." if that happens, show them this.
Yes, JohnW, you are stupid and obnoxious.
It is very telling that evoTARDs are too afraid to define how they are using the word "trap".
I doubt that Dr H even understands that CO2 only absorbs 8% of what the earth emits. You morons definitely never knew that
And the earth only receives 0.000000000095% of the energy generated by the sun. By Joke math, that means that it would have no affect on the temperature of the earth.
I still maintain the possibility that "Joe" is a Poe. This guy thinks molecules have to be "pointed in the right direction" to radiate energy, but he's going to opine on what my thermodynamics professor understands? It's too ridiculous to be believable. Joe's like a comic-book character of a creationist.
You are an ignorant asshole. I never made the claim you are attributing to me. And your professor doesn't understand the word trap- neither do you. And you had no clue that CO2 only absorbs 8% of what the earth emits.
And the earth only absorbs 0.000000000095% Of what the sun emits. Follow your Joke math/logic to its inevitable conclusion.
AB, the fatal flaw in your reasoning is the assumption that "inevitable conclusions" exist in Joemath. Under Joemath, the conclusions are whatever Joe needs them to be in order for his argument to survive. (Note that I'm using the loosest definitions of "argument" and "survive" in the history of human language).
Thus, under Joemath, 4% = 0, but 0.000000000095% >> 0.
Don't forget with Joemodynamics anthropogeneic global warming can't be real because then we would not see temperatures cool down at night.
"Science is what got us to the humble place we’re at, and what hard-won progress we might realize comes from science, with ID completely flaccid, religious apologetics bitching from the sidelines." - Eigenstate at UD