Joined: Jan. 2008
|We know that, according to our experience, functionally complex specified information always indicates design. Not often, not once in a while, but always. Science proceeds on the assumption that we live in a rational universe and that laws, chance, and design are all part of the overall operation of the cosmos.|
Given that fact, ...
Sometimes I get the feeling that in reality there're two parallel universes, one in which people like StephenB live, and ours. It's only by some glitch in the fabric of the universe that we can read UD.
|If you find something not designed that has CSI, Dembski’s null hypothesis is false.|
Now tell me, how would you know that something that exhibits CSI was not designed if your only proposed "method" to identify design is looking for CSI?
Enquiring minds want to know.
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner