Joined: July 2006
I saw you had made a comment on the Behe review page here where you say
|evolutionists will again contort their plastic theory and dating scheme and crow how science is not the search for absolute truth and is self correcting.|
The problem is that with a plastic dating scheme, how is it falsifiable if we keep finding items out of order and then readjusting the dats to put them in order? Talk about moving the goal posts!
As has been discussed elsewhere on this forum, the article you link to at uncommondescent a few posts into this page here was shown to be a simple misunderstanding of the facts.
Now, so far so average for IDC. A quick search on the name you used for your post brings us to this chap
|Chris Gieschen is a science teacher at Concordia Lutheran High School in Fort Wayne, IN. According to him, “One of the perks of my ministry there has been directing plays, which I have adored doing for the past 20 years.”|
What I want to ask you, if that is indeed you, is how can a science teacher be fooled by the misma they spew at uncommondescent?
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand