RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (36) < ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense: The BlogCzar Years. Er, Months., Record of all the bans and threats at UD< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
JohnW



Posts: 2816
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 28 2013,18:17   

Quote (Kantian Naturalist @ Mar. 28 2013,16:02)
A few times KF has alluded to various threats he's received, hackers attacking his website, stuff like that.  He attributes it all to  the Darwinists, of course.  I have no idea what evidence he has for that attribution.

People used his real name, after he linked to another site where he used it.  

And they laughed at him.

That's pretty much it.  As far as I know, he's never presented evidence for anything else.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Freddie



Posts: 369
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 02 2013,12:08   

CharlieD has outstayed his welcome - well, to be honest with his style of post (fun as it was) it was only a matter of time.  And Barry.



--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1029
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 11 2013,03:16   

(Sigh - I think this is where I came in - Dense is trying to discredit the theory of evolution by argument-that-Darwin-was-a-Brit-toff.)

Anyway, although he was sorta asking for it, I think Joeatle's bannination in that thread deserves recording here.
A response to Byers on that thread now appears as:
       
Quote
7
JoealtleJune 10, 2013 at 4:13 pm

Joealtle believes he can come into someone else’s virtual house and spew obscenities. He was warned to stop. He did not heed the warning and is no longer with us. UD



UD link
I saw the comment, but but don't quite recall the content. However, it was something like this one, also a reply to Byers, still up there at the moment on another thread:
       
Quote
2
JoealtleJune 10, 2013 at 3:49 pm

Except stromatolites show a slow decrease in population size, not a sudden dying off, and in fact, there are still some around today. You should get your facts from reliable sources instead of fables.
Dumbfuck.

Hahahahaha

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
Henry J



Posts: 4689
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 11 2013,23:15   

But what's obscene about stromatolites?  :O

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 1466
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 12 2013,16:16   

Quote (Henry J @ June 11 2013,23:15)
But what's obscene about stromatolites?  :O

Have you seen what they do at night?

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
Henry J



Posts: 4689
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 12 2013,22:04   

Quote (Texas Teach @ June 12 2013,15:16)
Quote (Henry J @ June 11 2013,23:15)
But what's obscene about stromatolites?  :O

Have you seen what they do at night?

No, but how bad can it be? They don't even have gender! (Do they?)

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2543
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2013,01:28   

Quote (Henry J @ June 12 2013,20:04)
Quote (Texas Teach @ June 12 2013,15:16)
 
Quote (Henry J @ June 11 2013,23:15)
But what's obscene about stromatolites?  :O

Have you seen what they do at night?

No, but how bad can it be? They don't even have gender! (Do they?)

They're downright pervy. The original title of that Neil Diamond song was Turn on your Stromato-Lights. Coincidence? I think not!

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin

  
timothya



Posts: 256
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: June 13 2013,07:59   

At UD:

"Evolutionary Prediction About Humans"

Googly eyes are a prediction of evolutionary biology? Where did this come from? It is certainly true that if you combine access to Photoshop with a febrile imagination you will get . . . something strange.

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2013,09:25   

Quote (timothya @ June 13 2013,08:59)
At UD:

"Evolutionary Prediction About Humans"

Googly eyes are a prediction of evolutionary biology? Where did this come from? It is certainly true that if you combine access to Photoshop with a febrile imagination you will get . . . something strange.

The rimshot is that the projected changes are described in the article as resulting from genetic engineering for space faring.

So the Googly eyes are designed!

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3992
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2013,09:41   

And presumably patentable.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
keiths



Posts: 2041
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 18 2013,11:05   

Cross-posted from the Uncommonly Dense thread:
Quote (keiths @ July 18 2013,09:03)
No one will be surprised to hear that I've been silently banned from UD.

This time Barry is wisely keeping his mouth shut instead of offering a bogus justification.


--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3992
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: July 18 2013,12:40   

Quote (keiths @ July 18 2013,11:05)
Cross-posted from the Uncommonly Dense thread:
Quote (keiths @ July 18 2013,09:03)
No one will be surprised to hear that I've been silently banned from UD.

This time Barry is wisely keeping his mouth shut instead of offering a bogus justification.

You shoot an intellectually unarmed man and expect to be acquitted?

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
keiths



Posts: 2041
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 18 2013,12:47   

Good point.  Guilty as charged.

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3992
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: July 18 2013,13:16   

Quote (keiths @ July 18 2013,12:47)
Good point.  Guilty as charged.

Barry obviously doesn't believe in stand your ground, or even in self defense.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2013,20:49   

I'll dump these here so that we can see how many get modified by Sal. Mung is a POS, no doubt, but I think it is his non-YEC views that earned him disappearances.

Quote

1
Mung August 20, 2013 at 6:15 pm
For the record: Salvador deletes another post of mine.

So, Salvador, what was so offensive about the content?

I once played an entire game of chess blindfolded and even won the game. Does that mean I’m good at chess?

I guess it challenged Sal’s belief that he is good at math because he got kicked out of a casino, and thus warranted deletion.

Good on ya Sal!

2
MungAugust 20, 2013 at 6:25 pm
Salvador seems to have embarked on a mission to excise all my posts in any thread he has authored.

That’s a FINE Christian thing to do, Sal.

Can I ask why such behavior is tolerated here at UD?

3
MungAugust 20, 2013 at 6:31 pm
The funny part is, in an amateurish attempt to cover his tracks, Sal even deleted his post inviting me to not participate in his threads. lol!

4
MungAugust 20, 2013 at 6:38 pm
For the record:

I responded to Elizabeth in the thread Am I the only ID proponent

The response had nothing to do with Salvador or his silly beliefs. He deleted it anyways, apparently for the sole reason that it was in a thread he had control over.

Good on ya Sal! That was the CHRISTIAN thing to do. You fraud. God is my witness.

5
MungAugust 20, 2013 at 6:39 pm
Barry, why do you allows this?

Denyse, you sit idly by?


Others also disappearing today:
Quote

scordovaAugust 20, 2013 at 10:24 am
Gregory,

Your worthless illogical incoherent bloviations aren’t worth my time. Your last comment moved to the spam queue.

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3992
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2013,22:02   

Sal and KF in Thunderdome.

Just idly thinking.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1783
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2013,22:42   

Over at UD Mung is still bitching about Slimy Sal.

UD isn't big enough to hold both of their egos, and I'm afraid Mung is going to be the odd asshat out.

--------------
"Science is what got us to the humble place we’re at, and what hard-won progress we might realize comes from science, with ID completely flaccid, religious apologetics bitching from the sidelines." - Eigenstate at UD

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1266
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2013,08:03   

Gregory supports Mung:  
Quote
That’s ‘Salvadorian Freedom’ in the light of Expelled Syndrome.

He even deletes posts of people when they are agreeing with him (!), as he just did to me in his ‘no positive argument for Design’ thread.


And Alan Fox:
Quote
That’s nothing. He even deleted a comment of mine at TSZ in one of his guest posts! J’étais carrément scandalisé!


--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10760
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2013,09:50   

Is this true:

"And Alan Fox: Quote  
That’s nothing. He even deleted a comment of mine at TSZ in one of his guest posts! J’étais carrément scandalisé!"

If so I hope his posting privallages were pulled.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1266
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2013,11:00   

Read it while it's still there:
UD:
http://tinyurl.com/m8twzde....m8twzde

Same discussion over at TSZ:

http://theskepticalzone.com/wp....?....?p=3024

ETA: Short link to TSZ
http://tinyurl.com/ke59eax....ke59eax

Edited by Kattarina98 on Aug. 21 2013,18:19

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1783
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 15 2013,09:38   

Another one bites the dust.

Quote
News  September 15, 2013 at 3:41 am

AVS is no longer with us.


Which one of you bastids was AVS?

--------------
"Science is what got us to the humble place we’re at, and what hard-won progress we might realize comes from science, with ID completely flaccid, religious apologetics bitching from the sidelines." - Eigenstate at UD

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2013,21:55   

Whatever-the-fuck combination of Sal's and Mung's egos + mental "prowess" produced this, it seems worth preserving, for the record:

Quote
MungSeptember 20, 2013 at 6:37 pm
I’D LIKE TO THANK SAL FOR HIS EDITORIAL REVISIONS OF MY POSTS. I’VE BEEN BANNED FROM ALL DISCUSSIONS HE AUTHORS. BUT LIKE A KNUCKLEHEAD I KEEP SHOWING UP UNIVITED IN HIS DISCUSSIONS EVEN THOUGH I KNOW THAT DOING SO WILL INVITE EDITORIAL REVISION OF MY POSTS. I GUESS I KEEP SHOWING UP UNINVITED DESPITE BEING BANNED BECAUSE I REALLY DESPISE SAL AND AM SO JEALOUS OF HIM AND JUST WANT TO MAKE TROUBLE FOR HIM BY STALKING HIS THREADS.

FOR EXAMPLE, I ACCUSED SAL OF NOT KNOWING HOW TO PROGRAM IN LANGAUGES LIKE C, C++, JAVA ETC. I JUST MADE THAT UP. I DON’T HAVE A COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREE LIKE SAL DOES. SAL HAS DEVELOPED SOFTWARE IN THE AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE INDUSTRY, BUT I DIDN’T BOTHER TO FIND THAT OUT BEFORE I JUST MAKE CRAP UP TO SMEAR HIM.

I ACCUSED HIM OF HAVING SILLY NOTIONS OF THERMODYNAMICS EVEN THOUGH I DON’T HAVE A GRADUATE DEGREE IN APPLIED PHYSICS LIKE SAL AND HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND THERMODYNAMICS LIKE SAL. I JUST DISLIKE SAL AND I’LL MAKE STUFF UP ABOUT HIM AND TROLL HIS DISCUSSIONS. AND THEN LIKE A TROLL I’LL ASK HIM IF HE’S GOOD IN MATH DESPITE THE FACT SAL HAS A DEGREE IN MATH AS WELL AS COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEEERING AND APPLIED PHYSICS DEGREES. HE COULDN’T STUDY PHYSICS IF HE SUCKED AT MATH LIKE I DO. BUT I JUST MAKE CRAP UP BECAUSE I’M TROLLING HIS DISCUSSIONS.

MY NAME IS MUNG AND THAT RHYMES WITH DUNG.

6
MungSeptember 22, 2013 at 3:11 pm
chllng Sl t SMR FF!

Wll, tht crtnl xplns lt! t snds lk Sl s tkng thngs rthr prsnll ftr ll. Ths n’s wrth svng fr pstrt.

Sl, f ‘m s ntnt n smrng r nm sr d ls jb f t. shld wn th cntst sl.

MY NAME IS MUNG AND I POST DUNG

7
MungSeptember 22, 2013 at 8:00 pm
Thanks SAL! You’re a real PAL!


Is the ALL CAPS Sal's edit?

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1188
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2013,23:15   

When TARD Collides.

  
JonF



Posts: 632
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 04 2013,12:32   

Barry has no answer but the hammer:

Elizabeth Liddle doubles down yet again. She is no longer with us.

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1029
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2013,17:19   

Two more sane people exit UD, one of his own volition, the other - not:
 
Quote
Alan Fox October 7, 2013 at 3:58 pm
Just to add to the retreat, I hear that commenter, Jerad, has been banned at Uncommon Descent. I think I too will retreat and leave you guys (not many women -why is that?) to your own devices. Call me when that ID theory coalesces.

UD link
(Cross posted from the Uncommonly Dense thread)

Edited: Maybe this was posted too soon. Follow up comment:
Quote
61
Barry Arrington October 7, 2013 at 9:47 pm

Fox: “I hear that commenter, Jerad, has been banned at Uncommon Descent”

Not true.


Edited by Ptaylor on Oct. 08 2013,16:09

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1783
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2013,16:02   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Oct. 07 2013,17:19)
Two more sane people exit UD, one of his own volition, the other - not:
     
Quote
Alan Fox October 7, 2013 at 3:58 pm
Just to add to the retreat, I hear that commenter, Jerad, has been banned at Uncommon Descent. I think I too will retreat and leave you guys (not many women -why is that?) to your own devices. Call me when that ID theory coalesces.

UD link
(Cross posted from the Uncommonly Dense thread)

Edited: Maybe this was posted too soon. Follow up comment:
   
Quote
61
Barry Arrington October 7, 2013 at 9:47 pm

Fox: “I hear that commenter, Jerad, has been banned at Uncommon Descent”

Not true.

Barry Assholeton has a new way to weasel.  BA defends his actions and claims Jerad wasn't banned, he now just has all of his posts kept in the permanent moderation queue until Barry decides Jerad's posts meets Barry's standards for ID acceptable content.

Sources tell us that will be the second Tuesday of next week.

--------------
"Science is what got us to the humble place we’re at, and what hard-won progress we might realize comes from science, with ID completely flaccid, religious apologetics bitching from the sidelines." - Eigenstate at UD

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3992
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 09 2013,07:28   

Double secret probation. Barry will negotiate just as soon as jerad capitulates.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 26 2013,12:41   

After giving Barry a verbal spanking, Pro Hac Vice gets the boot:

Quote

36 Barry Arrington November 26, 2013 at 12:15 pm

Pro Hac Vice, I notice that you dodged the questions in my 24. Into the moderation que with you demonstrate you are willing to argue in good faith by answering them.


Quite sad. PHV deserves a round of applause.

I count some 8 or so independent questions in Barry's 24. Some are questions: Agree with me? Now or later?, others just declarations with a "?":

Others are just too puerile to deserve a response:
Quote

You say it is possible for every proposition to be wrong. Is it possible for that proposition to be wrong?


PHV even announces in his post that he can't address them all immediately:

 
Quote
BA, I have to prioritize work today, so I may not be able to respond in my customary great length. Let me focus on what I think is the most important failure in your “argument” – it’s circular.


UD Link

Quote
The set ‘self-evident moral truths’ is not empty if there is at least one self-evident moral truth. There is at least one-self-evident moral truth. Therefore, the set ‘self-evident moral truths’ is not empty.

This is circular because, as you’ve admitted there’s no component argument for the existence of X1, you just assume it a priori. (This is despite your strange attempt to use absurdity as such an argument, which you seem to have abandoned.)

In other words, you’re assuming a priori that a self-evident moral truth exists, and using it as proof that self-evident moral truths exist. That’s circular. ....

Nothing in your post above is really an argument, though, is it? It all just rests on your personal assertions. This is the Grand Sez Who 2013 Edition. Self-evident moral truths exist. Sez who? Barry Arrington. This is one of them. Sez who? Barry Arrington. It’s impossible for Barry Arrington to be wrong about that. Sez who? Barry Arrington. It’s impossible for Barry Arrington to be wrong about being wrong. Sez who? Barry Arrington. It’s impossible for anyone to disagree with Barry Arrington. Sez who? Barry Arrington. Nothing ever resolves out to an argument that exists outside your own head, making it all ultimately a subjective assertion of truth.

Your assertions are not arguments. They’re impervious to reasoning or logic, being founded ultimately only on your say-so. I think that makes them impossible to refute or to prove. But since they’re founded ultimately on your perceptions and feelings, we’re still in a subjective and error-prone world. (Identifying truths about which it’s impossible to be wrong (assuming arguendo that you’ve done so) does not establish that your assertions fit within that set. And the one such truth you identified is actually self-evident in that denying it is self-refuting. “Barry Arrington can’t be wrong about this” is not self-evident in that way, as there’s nothing self-refuting about the statement, “Barry Arrington has mistakenly assumed his personal beliefs are self-evident objective moral truths.”)


Italics are BA's

Edited by REC on Nov. 26 2013,13:03

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 05 2014,17:06   

I guess this counts:

Quote

26 kairosfocus March 5, 2014 at 4:41 pm
Mr Matzke,

I scrolled up to post 15 ff.

I see you already tried a turnabout and pretzel twist game, compounding what you have done in recent weeks.

Strike three.

PLEASE LEAVE THIS THREAD, AND PLEASE DO NOT POST IN ANY THREADS I OWN UNTIL YOU CAN FIND THE BASIC MANNERS TO APOLOGISE FOR AND FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE YOUR CONDUCT TOWARDS BASIC CIVILITY.

Any further posts from you in this and future threads I own will be deleted, until you show that you have a civil tongue in your head.

Good day

GEM of TKI


No idea what provoked this response. Looks like Nick entered the thread to respond to an accusation of racism (for which he got an apology) and an accusation of outing a private conversation.

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1029
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 05 2014,19:59   

Quote (REC @ Mar. 06 2014,10:06)
I guess this counts:

   
Quote

26 kairosfocus March 5, 2014 at 4:41 pm
Mr Matzke,

I scrolled up to post 15 ff.

I see you already tried a turnabout and pretzel twist game, compounding what you have done in recent weeks.

Strike three.

PLEASE LEAVE THIS THREAD, AND PLEASE DO NOT POST IN ANY THREADS I OWN UNTIL YOU CAN FIND THE BASIC MANNERS TO APOLOGISE FOR AND FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE YOUR CONDUCT TOWARDS BASIC CIVILITY.

Any further posts from you in this and future threads I own will be deleted, until you show that you have a civil tongue in your head.

Good day

GEM of TKI


No idea what provoked this response. Looks like Nick entered the thread to respond to an accusation of racism (for which he got an apology) and an accusation of outing a private conversation.

And this:
 
Quote
28
NickMatzke_UDMarch 5, 2014 at 5:20 pm

KF — let’s see, early in this thread, some before I started posting, I had several charges of dishonesty, inappropriate disclosure of confidential correspondence, and basically, racism thrown at me. Your response to all of that? Nada. When I get annoyed and dare to defend myself, you drop the ban-hammer on me.

It’s not censorship, it’s just dumb. Who do you think you are fooling? Do you want to have a credible site, or one where the craziest basic mistakes about even simple matters far away from the science issues go uncorrected?

is now this:
 
Quote

28
NickMatzke_UDMarch 5, 2014 at 5:20 pm

Mr Matzke thinks that doubling down on accusations can help him get away with false accusations, similar to his literature bluffs that have already served the cause of injustice. When he learns civility he may return to threads I own. KF

Edit: For the record, KF has now added the following to comment 28:
Quote
As for his attempts to belittle and derail discussion of a report that something out there has caused VJT’s thread to go viral, which turned out to be a republication of a story; let the resort to pettiness, churlishness, out of order behaviour, rudeness and the like speak for itself in the context of over a year in the which any objector to design theory anywhere in the world has had a free kick at goal, and there has been a refusal to take it. Likewise, it should be quite clear that I have no power to censor NM, i.e. suppress his freedom to express himself as he likes, but I am taking the step of saying his rudeness and pattern of false accusations of dishonesty have worn out his welcome in threads I own. I trust that this modest disciplinary step may help wake him up after his tantrum passes, and he will find it in himself to make amends. Enough is enough. KF


Edited by Ptaylor on Mar. 06 2014,13:10

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
  1067 replies since July 29 2007,19:21 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (36) < ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]