oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006
|
Quote (Daniel Smith @ Nov. 29 2008,18:18) | I too have seen no evidence that any of you have the vaguest idea of how or why nature created anything. |
Oh, and it took you, what, 4 days to come back with that?
Read any of those books you were told you could get on inter-library loan yet?
Bible changed much since you last banged your head with it?
EDIT: Let's remind ourselves of what Daniel wants Quote | What I want is an undisputed (by the experts), verifiable (all chemical steps worked out), possible pathway from non-life to life, or (if you read my blog) from some plausible precursor to the present E. coli amino acid synthesis system for lysine, threonine, isoleucine, and methionine. There must be sufficient detail and the scientific community must reach a consensus that, 'yes, we've figured it out'.
Now, I don't have the background in chemistry to fully understand most of this. I'm currently studying a biochemistry textbook to try to learn as much as I can about such things. In fact that's where I got the idea for this prediction in the first place. I found the E. Coli biochemical pathway in there and I thought, "how do they explain this?". |
Link Tell me Daniel, how do you suppose the path "from non-life to life" is any different from the question "how did life arise".
So, it's clear, until you fools on this board answer Daniels question "how did life arise" it's all just handwaving and it's obvious that none of you have the vaguest idea of how or why nature created anything ever anyway because you can't answer that simple question.
Twat.
-------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings
|