NoName
Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013
|
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 28 2015,04:35) | Quote (NoName @ Oct. 27 2015,07:27) | Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,04:44) | ... YOU HAVE NO SCIENCE and that it is!
You have religion only... |
Redefining terms to suit your own prejudices is dishonest.
But then you're the idiot who thinks categorization is explanation. Who thinks definition is explanation. Who thinks one cannot use a thing without knowing the definition for it.
You are the man who doesn't understand intelligence because he has never experienced it.
Meanwhile, in the real world, you have no science, you are not part of science, you have nothing to offer to science. And everyone other than you knows it. |
That is we do science. We redefine and categorize many X so that we could understand the whole natural realm..
YOU HAVE NOTHING! Really, you have only religion! |
Who is this 'we' of whom you speak? You are no part of science. You are ignored by the profession, properly so. You have contributed nothing to the fields of science. You understand nothing of 'the natural realm'. And we are the ones who have science.
So to repeat, redefining terms, such as 'religion' and 'science' to suit your own self-aggrandizing needs and prejudices, is dishonest. It is also failing you, as you are convincing no one.
You have no science. None whatsoever. And instead of providing evidence to substantiate your claims (which is how science is done, as you clearly do not know), you shriek and howl and demand that people 'shut up shut up'. Not impressive, Edgar.
In fact, you lose. You act like a loser because you are a loser.
|