C.J.O'Brien
Posts: 395 Joined: Aug. 2005
|
Quote (dhogaza @ June 28 2006,12:46) | Quote | I'm curious as to why the big bang is being lobbed at scientists. I'm relatively sure it was.. you know.. scientists who actually came up with that one. Is it another one of those "scientists did it but it's a victory for ID!" things? |
Some believe that since the Big Bang postulates a beginning, it supports the Judeo-Christian creation myth. |
A CreoBot of my acquaintance loves this one. The reasoning seems to be that, before Hubble, the scientific consensus was a static, eternal cosmos. In fact, Einstein added the cosmological constant to the GR equations specifically in order to reconcile them with a static universe (one that is not expanding or contracting).
So, to the creos, the Big Bang theory is a big turn-about that somehow proves they were right all along. And it allows them to imagine bigwig scientists, like Einstein, with egg on their face when the truth came out.
What's funny about it to me is that the pre-Big Bang consensus doesn't seem to have been supported by any particular data. It was just something "everone knew." But to creos, it was evidence that the establishment was stubbornly assuming that any teleological account of creation was out of bounds, and now that there's a big bang, well we knew Gawd musta done it, all along.
-------------- The is the beauty of being me- anything that any man does I can understand. --Joe G
|