N.Wells
Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 15 2014,06:38) | Quote (Lethean @ April 15 2014,06:04) | #996: Joan Ocean
Quote | Joan Ocean comes across as a really nice but stunningly crazy lady who, according to her bio, has a degree in Counseling Psychology and is “internationally known for her work in the field of human-dolphin and whale communication.”
[...]
At present she “experiences the gentle communication of the dolphins and whales as sound holography [yeah, you think you’ll get a further explanation? Good luck with that], a language that intensifies physical senses, bypasses rational-cognitive paradigms [indeed], resonates directly with our cellular intelligence, and awakens multiple levels of perception and consciousness.”
[...]
Ocean has determined that “the cetaceans are able to encode frequencies to resonate with our personal patterns as we swim among them in the ocean,” and the information they convey is apparently therefore “translatable by us, because they are using our own neurological fibers, non-verbal, non-cognitive, emotional programs as the medium for communication.” But we should let Ocean explain: “It is through our feelings and intuition that we are able to access this transmission. The cetaceans are advanced in the science of esoteric, multi-dimensional intelligences which include both the capacity to understand the intentions, motivations, desires and universal blueprint/patterns/sigils of others and the capacity to understand themselves in the same way.” |
I thought Gary might find Ocean's ideas notable enough to incorporate into his theory. I'm still trying to wrap my head around the bolded bits, especially the "resonates directly with our cellular intelligence" part. Perhaps Gary could shed some light on this. |
Go screw yourself. |
Lethean, thank you very much for sharing that gem.
So, Gary, if Joan Ocean's work runs counter to your understanding of cellular intelligence and multiple levels of perception and consciousness, in what way(s) is she wrong, and how do we know that?
|