k.e..
Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007
|
Quote (Quack @ Aug. 24 2015,09:06) | Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 23 2015,09:16) | Joe,
Quick question.
You continually claim that ID is ok with evolution (whatever that means), yet you also continually attempt to show that evolution doesn't work.
Why? |
Evolution works, but not by RM&NS, isn't that the foundation of ID?
We have "ID light" proponents like Behe who need the designer to step in and give evolution a nudge at critical branching points. Like equipping bacteria with flagella, how else could they possibly have got them?
And we have the all-out kind like Dembski who is both an ID proponent as well as a YEC and also proposing that "Intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel", whatever he think that means - to me it makes no sense whatsoever. Anyway, it looks like he is apt to say whatever it takes to placate his employers.
You can't support ID unless you are able to ride two horses at once. |
Two lambs maybe but since he's a numbers man.... Numbers 23:22 “God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn.”
Those unicorn are sexy beasts...makes you wonder why they didn't survive...oh here's why.
Psalms 92:10 “But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be anointed with fresh oil.”
-------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin
|