Joe G
Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007
|
Quote (OgreMkV @ Mar. 02 2010,11:32) | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 02 2010,08:32) | Quote (OgreMkV @ Mar. 02 2010,08:09) | Joe, are you ever going to put forth any positive evidence for ID, other than "I can sees it"?
When are you going to fill in the blanks on the ID science report I typed up for you? You know where you have actual values for specified complexity and you compare those values to things that are of known design and known randomness.
Until you do that, your IDs are just a waste of electrons.
I'd also like to point out that Wells, Dembski, and Behe ARE ID. They created it (well, after blatantly stealing it from Paley). You haven't written several books on ID. Until you do, then they get to decide what ID is, not you.
And they have all decided that ID is a religious program with no scientific merit. So, are you going to stand up to Dembski and tell him that he's wrong and that ID isn't religious? |
Ogre,
Are you going to put fortth any positive evidence that supports your position?
BTW Dr Behe accepts Common Descent- meaning ID does not argue against Common Descent. And all three say ID is scientific.
It is based on observations and experiences. It can be objectively tested.
Now what?
You still don't have any way to test your claims.
All you have is the refusal to allow the design inference at all costs.
So tell me assface- how can we test the premise that the bacterial flagellum "evolved" via an accumulation of genetic accidents?
<a href=http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2008/02/supporting-intelligent-design.html><b>Supporting ID</b></a>
and
<a href=http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2010/02/more-evidence-for-intelligent-design.html><b>more evidence for ID</b></a>
You do realize that you can falsify ID just by substantiating the claims of your position? |
I'll type this slowly: are YOU ever going to put forth some evidence for ID, on this here forum? (Hint CTRL-C and CTRL-V are not evidence.)
Please use your words (minus the cursing, peer-reviewed journals frown on calling the editor 'dickhead'). |
Ogre,
I take it that you are too ignorant to follow the links I provided.
Not my problem asshole.
But anyway are YOU ever going to put forth some positive evidence to support your position?
For example how can we test the premise that the bacterial flagellum "evolved" via an accumulation of genetic accidents?
-------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Â Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|