Lou FCD
Posts: 5455 Joined: Jan. 2006
|
Quote (lcd @ July 03 2008,17:55) | Okay all you Nazi Evolutionists*
(* is this better Lou?) |
A little better, it has a more finished feel to it.
Quote (lcd @ July 03 2008,17:55) | Okay, I need to deliver up a "Theory of Information". |
Theory is such a strong word. Perhaps you might look up what it means to a scientist, and get off on a better footing.
Quote (lcd @ July 03 2008,17:55) | So I say that there is Information in DNA. I am also saying that this Information can be destroyed but idea that useful info can come about over random processes is not possible.
Now what type of Information is there in DNA? I doubt that the analogy that it is a Document while easy to understand is a very accurate statement. After all we really haven't mapped out the human DNA yet, right? So it will be tough to accually see what's going on.
But we can still do this:
1: My Theory is that DNA has Information that can be destroyed.
2: IT also includes that DNA has Information that is front loaded in the DNA. These parts become active when other parts become de-activated.
3: The prediction that I will state for now, yes I'll do more but I have to learn the terminology better and I'll have to do more studying, is that when you change DNA the function it controls is lost. |
Have you tested this idea? How would you go about that? How would you measure the information and what units of measurement would you use?
Has anyone ever even attempted to do this measurement, or defined the units? If so, could you provide a link to the papers? (I prefer .pdfs myself.)
Tell me how you can tell if this information is front-loaded. What test would conclusively determine that the information is in fact front-loaded? What result would disprove your idea? How long ago was it front-loaded, and how did you determine that?
Assuming you can confirm the information is real, that it has some meaning, that it can be measured, and that it is conclusively shown with evidence that it is front-loaded, who front-loaded it, and how would you go about testing that? Was it Yahweh? How do you know it wasn't Zeus or Odin, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or JanieBelle or purple octopus aliens from 55 Cancri?
Quote (lcd @ July 03 2008,17:55) | As I said, more later but the family is home.
Happy 4th everyone. |
Enjoy. You have much work to do upon your return before you can bandy about the term "theory" in this context. So relax and enjoy the beer and hotdogs, it may be a very long time before you get out of the lab again.
-------------- “Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?
Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend
|