NoName
Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 13 2015,14:09) | Quote (NoName @ Sep. 13 2015,11:55) | Hey Gary, have you figured out what your "theory" specifies as the muscle control systems Stephen Hawking used to come up with his theories? |
Yes.
Quote (NoName @ Sep. 13 2015,11:55) | How much does his muscular atrophy impact his intelligence? |
Very much. Which is why he's lucky that only a portion of one intelligence level's motor system out of three was impaired. Losing all of any would be fatal, in which case he would not be able to write any more theories.
Quote (NoName @ Sep. 13 2015,11:55) | Is the relationship between muscle control systems and intelligence quantifiable? |
All motor neurons send a signal to a motor muscle that in turn has a sensory feedback neuron back to the brain. Cells use signaling molecules in two way metabolic networks that control its many motor protein controlled functions. At the genetic level there are mobile elements that are able to (readdress) motor themselves from place to place in the genome. Without molecular motor systems the products of gene expression would build up in one place instead of being neatly delivered to where it is needed in the cell. Computer models provide the variables needed to objectively quantify everything.
Quote (NoName @ Sep. 13 2015,11:55) | If not, why not? If it is, what are the units, how are they measured? |
Success rate and confidence levels are measured over time, and are shown using line chart like this:
Quote (NoName @ Sep. 13 2015,11:55) | Are the specific muscle control systems used by any particular act of 'intelligence' directly related to the specific kinds of 'intelligent' acts or is any old sort of muscular control system usage sufficient? |
I have no idea what you are asking. I think that is because what you said makes no scientific sense, to begin with. |
No, what you're saying makes no sense.
Specifically, you assert that for any act to count as 'intelligent' it must inherently include a loop to<>from a motor control circuit. This is clearly false, for no motor control circuit is involved in the "level of intelligence" used by Stephen Hawking to develop any of his theories. He has motor control circuits in service of life, not in service of intelligence. You do not insist that life is a pre-requisite to intelligence. You do, however, insist that motor control is.
What motor control system is inherent to Hawking's theorizing? Unlike you he doesn't move his lips when he thinks, so, no motor control involved in his theorizing as such.
Damn, you're stupid.
|