Occam's Aftershave
Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006
|
Quote (stevestory @ June 03 2015,17:08) | Just took a look around UD. Denyse actually has a thread up where she quotes Peter Woit, string theory critic, and then basically just says there's no science in string theory, it's just done "because pop culture needs it."
You know, because that's why theoretical physicists spend decades of their lives studying stultifyingly complex mathematical constructs. To satisfy pop culture. |
O'Dreary has really been going off the rails lately, assuming she was ever on them in the first place. Like her OP claiming that there was no such thing as macroevolution. I though even the IDiots all agreed macroevolution happens, it's just GAWD, er, the Designer directed.
The Big Tent gets more tattered every day.
-------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims."
- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.
|