Bjarne
Posts: 29 Joined: Dec. 2009
|
Quote (Robert Byers @ Mar. 12 2010,08:38) | Quote (Badger3k @ Mar. 11 2010,09:44) | Quote (Bjarne @ Mar. 11 2010,07:53) | Quote (Robert Byers @ Mar. 11 2010,08:11) | Quote (Bjarne @ Mar. 09 2010,04:01) | Quote (Robert Byers @ Mar. 09 2010,07:12) | Quote (bfish @ Mar. 05 2010,11:12) | Quote (Robert Byers @ Mar. 04 2010,22:54) | Genetics are not a trail but a result of like parts equals like dna. No evolution here by selection on mutation and so. So it also teaches that creatures did change suddenly from innate abilities to adapt to the earth.
This would explain much about fossil and living diversity. |
With all due respect, it wouldn't explain crap.
The genetics is irrelevant? What do you propose happens? The animal changes shape, grows a pouch, and then the DNA changes in response?
All your research team needs to do is explain this mechanism, and you're all set! |
Well genetics was not my agenda when I began. I just ran into the claims of genetics to draw relationship between marsupials when in fact they are unrelated to each other save from like influences. Dna is in fact just representing a parts department in life. Its only a special case that having such intimate like parts allows me to be connected to my father. Therefore it must be there is a innate ability of life to react to influences in order to thrive. This atomic code means that when a change has taken place then ones dna will have changed too. Dna is hand in glove with the living creature. Change the creature change the dna. The dna of coarse must be a part of the change. Anyways dna is a primitive entry subject. The relationships between creatures must be and is by anatomical principals. |
Okay, I'll ask you this question again: According to your speculation, DNA changes in reaction to anatomical changes in an animal. This idea predicts, that a mouse's DNA would change after we cut off its tail. Do you agree with that?
And a second question: IF DNA does not do what we think it to do, how are proteins produced in a cell? |
No. The tail didn't change but was removed without a innate change. I'm saying Dna and bodies are hand in glove. The complexity of the body allows ideas that innate triggers are there to bring change to the body and so the Dna would also have added or subtracted from some atomic points. As surely as upon puberty there is a change in the body though it includes the dna. The dna in this case has within already a ability to bring change. Its just a further step that change can change the dna. |
Do I understand you correctly? You assume, that during puberty, our DNA changes?
And, how are proteins produced in cells? |
I'm more concerned how DNA changes at "atomic points" - does that mean DNA is the same size as atoms? Is DNA a new elementary particle? Does this mean DNA is produced in the furnace of stars like heavier elements?
Robert sounds like he gets his genetics from bad sci fi or horrible comic books.
Robert, in science, let alone just English, words have specific meanings. I know your crew likes to toss words out as if they can mean whatever you want them to mean, but they can't. We call it "using sciency words" - using scientific terms in completely wrong usages in order to give a crackpot idea some illusion of science to the rubes. I doubt you even know the meaning of half the words you use, and like Quack said, it's probably useless to try to teach you, since you are both unwilling and probably unable to learn. |
I do see DNA as a atomic thing. I mean the smallness of nature revealing itself. Dna is still a very primitive field still. Conclusions are being made with no substantial evidence. So creationism can offer alternatives. The evidence shows quick instant adaptation. So Dna must be flexible to aid in this. I know marsupials and other orders of creatures are just placentals of creatures we have everywher on earth. So I know DNA is not a trail here but only a indication that like parts equal like DNA. Also a change to different parts amongst many unrelated creatures will result in like DNA for those parts. No reason not to see it that way. |
And how are proteins produced in cells?
|