RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 195 196 197 198 199 [200] 201 202 203 204 205 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,02:50   

I notice that since JoeG grossed Cornelius into shutting down comments on Darwin's God, there hasn't been a new posting since July 31.

Design or chance?

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,03:21   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Aug. 22 2012,21:40)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ Aug. 22 2012,17:29)
     
Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,12:43)
       
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)

 Anyone know what he is talking about? "hate site initiative"? "suspicious associations tied in with porn"?


He is talking about the fact that our esteemed Lou once posted a link to photo's he had taken professionally that were hosted on his own website.  At least one of the pictures showed - gasp - a woman's naughty bits (above the waist only, I might add, but still devil's dumplings to be sure!)

Since then, he has taken several opportunities to state that this site associates with others offering pornography, or something like that.  Sounds libelous to me, anyway.

Anyone got a link to that great passage where KF talks at length about having to force himself to watch some hot girl on girl action?

Here's one example:

"My wife drew my attention to it, and late one evening I took time to watch; only, to see an informal lewdness contest by a circle of women, "won" by one who shocked her companions by exposing then pulling down her underwear and publicly sexually manipulating her now quite plainly visible private parts in front of the now tightly focussed, pruriently watching cameras..."

From the last letter here.

Did he leave a link?  I have a deep yearning to admire God's handiwork and perhaps pick up a few design tips in the process.

If you're referring to what gordo watched, there's no link. He watched it on TV, and I don't think that he ever links to the porn he watches on the internet. He's a greedy bugger and wants to keep it all to himself. It's interesting that he added "late one evening", and even more interesting that he added "...in front of the now tightly focussed, pruriently watching cameras..." which of course wouldn't matter at all if gordo hadn't pruriently watched the "tightly focused", alleged "lewdness". He said that his wife drew his attention to the TV show which means that his wife must have watched it, and apparently gordo just had to see the 'tight focus' for himself ("late one evening").

The thing is, according to gordo, when he contacted the TV station to complain the TV station said that the show was "unauthorised", yet it was "repeatedly shown for several days on my local access cable tv channel in Jamaica, at all hours of day and night" (how did gordo know that?) and that the TV station was skeptical of what he said happened on the show (even though they could easily check it if they didn't already know what was in it), and that he "explained in a bit more details" (more like several thousand words of details) and then they allegedly said that they would "act to see to it that such lewd and illegal public displays would never happen again on their channel".

Hmm, his wife watched it, and then gordo watched it over and over again, for several days and nights, at all hours. If he didn't, how could he have known that it was repeatedly shown for several days and nights at all hours of day and night? He also obviously didn't complain immediately and explain in a bit more details because if he had the show would have not been broadcast for several days and nights at all hours of day and night if the TV station was informed that that broadcast was showing "lewd and illegal public displays". Obviously, before he decided to complain, gordo wanted to watch the show many times so that he could explain the lewdness in a bit more detail.

If you're referring to Lou's photo(s), they're probably still posted or there are links but I don't remember which thread they're in. gordo viewed the photo(s) to gather a bit more details too. He likely has them in a special folder in his computer so that he can quickly access them to view a bit more details, at all hours of day and night.

Yes, I know that you're joking or semi-joking (maybe). :)

Edited by The whole truth on Aug. 23 2012,04:22

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,04:36   

Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,15:46)
   
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 22 2012,15:09)
Would someone care to point out to sanctimonious prick KF that Joe (who has his 6!) has posted pictures of ladies genitalia here, on TSZ and his own blog. And ask him why he and Joe are 6-watching buds.

       
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)
KF doesn't get the "so long as you don’t link to porn" on TSZ reference to Joe's 'tunie' link, and has this to say:

<snip>

I just can't get my head around the KF/Joe bond.  


Fnarrr fnarrr.

Joe is KF's biology expert. A similarly odd relationship was notable with William J Murray and Joe at TSZ. Being on the the same side is seemingly more important than being anything else.

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,05:19   

Quote (The whole truth @ Aug. 23 2012,01:29)
Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,12:43)
 
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)

 Anyone know what he is talking about? "hate site initiative"? "suspicious associations tied in with porn"?


He is talking about the fact that our esteemed Lou once posted a link to photo's he had taken professionally that were hosted on his own website.  At least one of the pictures showed - gasp - a woman's naughty bits (above the waist only, I might add, but still devil's dumplings to be sure!)

Since then, he has taken several opportunities to state that this site associates with others offering pornography, or something like that.  Sounds libelous to me, anyway.

Anyone got a link to that great passage where KF talks at length about having to force himself to watch some hot girl on girl action?

Here's one example:

"My wife drew my attention to it, and late one evening I took time to watch; only, to see an informal lewdness contest by a circle of women, "won" by one who shocked her companions by exposing then pulling down her underwear and publicly sexually manipulating her now quite plainly visible private parts in front of the now tightly focussed, pruriently watching cameras..."

From the last letter here.

Oh Christ ....KF is gay.

Every woman knows that sort of stuff makes straight guys horny, mine just asks me to get a bottle of wine.

FFS KF.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,06:20   

Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,12:43)
   
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)

 Anyone know what he is talking about? "hate site initiative"? "suspicious associations tied in with porn"?


...then pulling down her underwear and publicly sexually manipulating her now quite plainly visible private parts in front of the now tightly focussed, pruriently watching cameras..."

From the last letter here.

"Tightly focused, pruriently watching cameras?"  

Any premature flashes?

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,07:21   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 23 2012,04:36)
       
Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,15:46)
           
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 22 2012,15:09)
Would someone care to point out to sanctimonious prick KF that Joe (who has his 6!) has posted pictures of ladies genitalia here, on TSZ and his own blog. And ask him why he and Joe are 6-watching buds.

                 
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)
KF doesn't get the "so long as you don’t link to porn" on TSZ reference to Joe's 'tunie' link, and has this to say:

<snip>

I just can't get my head around the KF/Joe bond.  


Fnarrr fnarrr.

Joe is KF's biology expert. A similarly odd relationship was notable with William J Murray and Joe at TSZ. Being on the the same side is seemingly more important than being anything else.

Talking of WJM, a fine piece of selective blindness:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-430853

       
Quote
I’ve come to realize that many people suffer from a kind of theism/religion derangement syndrome, much like Bush or Palin derangement syndrome, and are fundamentally incapable of reasonable conversation/debate when it comes to those subjects. For some, like Dr. Liddle at SZ, it appears only as a kind of short-circuited logic and a disruption in otherwise good reasoning skills; for most, though, the derangement goes further into a kind of hateful madness where any behavior against such beliefs is justified, no matter how uncivil or extreme.


I'm not sure that "Bush/Palin derangement syndrome" has been formally classified...! Nor can I tell whether WJM is referring to everybody, or just atheists - but I'm reading it as "present company excepted, of course". He has Walked Among Them, and can confirm that they are, indeed, savages.

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,08:20   

Oh it's about to get good!

Joe:

Quote
25JoeAugust 23, 2012 at 5:21 am
vel:

You are excitable ,KF, the porn allusion was aimed at Mayor( Joe) who managed to get himself banned for posting porn.

Nope, I did not post any porn. Obviously you have no clue as to what porn is.

By vel’s “logic” Lizzie Liddle posted porn on her own blog.


KF:

Quote
26kairosfocusAugust 23, 2012 at 6:19 am
Joe:

Thanks for letting us hear your side in outline –as you can imagine, I could say nothing to the matter (other than that I should have noted that one does not make so strong a claim without justification, as a matter of fairness — oops, sorry on that . . . slipped my head) do you want to give any details or links?

KF


Oh YES, KF! We want to give you links:

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012....hy.html

Read the whole thing at your 'friend', 6-watcher Joe's blog.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,08:57   

Atheism and sexual deviancy

Huh! It's about adultery. When was that branded deviant? Meantime, UD's ad-popup is inviting me to meet singles in my area ... I'm married, dammit! But they sure look ... get behind me, Satan!

Edited by Soapy Sam on Aug. 23 2012,08:58

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
dvunkannon



Posts: 1377
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,09:14   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Aug. 23 2012,00:29)
 
Quote (sparc @ Aug. 22 2012,10:19)
   
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 22 2012,00:41)
Bonus:

       
Quote
If it had not been for C.S. Lewis, a Christian friend, the ID movement, and You Know Who, I might have condemned my children to a lifetime of darkness, as promoted by people like Richard Dawkins.


Here's my guesses for "You Know Who":

1) Liberace
2) Unnamed designer
3) Mr. Leathers
4) The guy that makes ladies blouses in men's sizes

HALP!


Gil's weeding was mentioned in the local press.

OMG!!  He maried a Gay!!!

I wonder what Janie Gay thinks about her husband's conversion from French teaching pianiste to Bibble thumping amnesiac?

Extra Free Bonus Gift - Check out the top of that page from the Tri City Herald for their view of "the blacks" getting together and doing a theater production of "The Amen Corner", by James Baldwin. If there was any play that Gil should have gone to see on his honeymoon, it was Amen Corner.

Who is You Know Who? Could it be....


Satan????

--------------
I’m referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
I’m not an evolutionist, I’m a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima

  
Patrick



Posts: 666
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,09:49   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 23 2012,09:20)
Oh it's about to get good!

Joe:

Quote
25JoeAugust 23, 2012 at 5:21 am
vel:

You are excitable ,KF, the porn allusion was aimed at Mayor( Joe) who managed to get himself banned for posting porn.

Nope, I did not post any porn. Obviously you have no clue as to what porn is.

By vel’s “logic” Lizzie Liddle posted porn on her own blog.


Is Joe really attempting to make the argument that it is acceptable for him to post explicit pictures of genitalia as long as said pictures are not intended to make the viewers sexually aroused?

If kairosfocus gets aroused by a picture posted by Joe, does he make a sound?

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,10:18   

KF tries to bully from the pulpit:

Quote
WJM:

I hear you.

I take a different view.

If the train is heading for a bridge out, someone needs to warn.

Not least so some can get off before it is too late.

Failing that, I keep hearing the lesson of Ezekiel 3 and 33 in my head about the duty to warn.

That is why I speak above for record.

What is plain here is that we are seeing the exact sort of opening the door for nihilism and ruthless factions that evolutionary materialists are always so eager to tell us how dare you point to this as a problem for evolutionary materialism.

Indeed, it seems they think we are stupid or worse than that, to point this out.

But, the record, here with Petrushka as a poster child, is quite plain.

All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to remain or fall silent.

I will not be silent, and I will speak for record.

KF

PS: The astonishing thing is that, after it has been made quite plain by repeated cases how these folks habitually abuse people unwise enough to go to their hang-outs to try to discuss with them, they proceed to expect others to want to come there. Nope, I have no intention to wade into a swamp to get into a swamp mud wrestling match with those who — on plain track record — have the manners and attitude of a crocodile.

PPS: I think some of us need to beware of getting caught up in the Stockholm syndrome and the good-cop bad-cop game, thus, seeking/hoping for approval of determined, ruthless and nihilistic enemies. What is really going on is the marketing of evil: desensitisation to evil — now seen as “average” Internet behaviour, jamming out of objections and objectors through slander and strawman tactics, and conversion through manipulation.


And he wont be taking questions or engaging in dialogue.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,10:27   

KF wrote:
Quote
PPS: I think some of us need to beware of getting caught up in the Stockholm syndrome


"Some of us" = Sal Cordova, I suspect. Come back to the light.

Edited by Soapy Sam on Aug. 23 2012,10:29

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,10:39   

No-one's buying it, Gordon E Mullings - least of all you. We all know you'd get your clock cleaned in an open forum. Enjoy your pillow fort!

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,10:50   

Abuse=disagree. Sometimes disrespectfully.

Sort of like the way evilutionists are treated at UD except minus the threat of being banned for disagreeing.

To the best of my recollection, no one of the caliber of gpuccio has been treated disrespectfully. Vehemently opposed, but respected. Even Sal is treated as a rational opponent, despite some historical resentments.

Nope. The only thing you have to fear on an evo site is making a fool of yourself. It is cowardly to hide behind censorship.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,11:47   

Granville Sewell
 
Quote
Gordon,
But you have intelligence, so you can think ahead. Mutations will should only be selected if they improve the survivability rate immediately, not if they hold “promise” for improving survivability in later generations!

I can't work out if this is a tongue-in-cheek comment or if he is actually serious.

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,13:23   

Irony meters off, please.

Joey-porn-poster:

Quote
kairosfocus- those people lack self-awareness, diginity and integrity.


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,13:23   

KF will like this.

According to Cisco, by the year 2015, 1 million minutes of TV programming will cross the internet every second.  760,000 minutes of it will be porn.*



* I added the last part.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,15:05   

Barry Arrington continues his quest to push inconvenient questions off the first page. He has started what is at least the third thread at UD dealing with Upright Biped's semionic theory.

So he can start the whole thing over as if the links to TSZ don't exist, no one ever asked UB how his theory supports ID, whether he has evidence that the genetic code existed in its current form in the first replicator, or what the existence of red plastic balls has to do with evolution.

I predict that if anyone brings this up or posts links to the threads UB ran away from, they will conveniently stop posting after being warned of more serious forms of correction.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,15:09   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Aug. 23 2012,02:50)
I notice that since JoeG grossed Cornelius into shutting down comments on Darwin's God, there hasn't been a new posting since July 31.

Design or chance?

I pretty much predicted that. Joe killed it. No one cared what Hunter had to say. They went for the discussion.

It's possible that Corny simply got tired of being joked about.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
sparc



Posts: 2089
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,15:19   

Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,14:43)
   
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)

 Anyone know what he is talking about? "hate site initiative"? "suspicious associations tied in with porn"?


He is talking about the fact that our esteemed Lou once posted a link to photo's he had taken professionally that were hosted on his own website.  At least one of the pictures showed - gasp - a woman's naughty bits (above the waist only, I might add, but still devil's dumplings to be sure!)

Since then, he has taken several opportunities to state that this site associates with others offering pornography, or something like that.  Sounds libelous to me, anyway.

Anyone got a link to that great passage where KF talks at length about having to force himself to watch some hot girl on girl action?

According to his own Kairosfocus blog Mr. Mullings has quite some experience:
   
Quote
To see what that means practically, let us explore how a tidal wave of porn has been used to help pave the way for sexual orientation amorality, and for the acceptance of a radical redefinition of marriage to include the notion that a man can marry another man, or a woman another woman.

Let's put a face on the process (by virtue of fair use):




This lovely, fresh-faced smiling young miss (I gather she was precisely 18 at the time of this picture [and, no, I will NOT link the source that gives the context of that carefully cropped image . . . ]) would pass for the girl next door, and any young man would love to take such a beautiful young lady out on a date.
By cropping the picture he kept her private parts for himself but at the same time he could not resist to give us more details of course only to show his indignation:    
Quote
In fact, she is a rising "porn star."

The above image is a posed shot of her engaging in a lesbian sexual act, with details fully exposed.
To bad that  from the rest of his post it seems that he visited quite some of the linked sites    
Quote

(NB: The accompanying videos make it very plain that she is not just posing, but indulges for fun and profit in a wide range of on-camera sex acts with her "toys" [Betty Dodson's "self-love"], her girl friends [Dr Dodson's "partner sex" does not distinguish men/women or women/women] and her boy friends [in that order].  The girl friends also have linked sites. In these sites, some pictures and videos are accessible as free samples, and others on a subscription basis, i.e. the public are invited to become regular viewers of the ongoing addictive  story of the increasingly raunchy sexual adventures of this circle of porn actresses and their support men.
But it is not Gordon's mistake since:  
Quote
There is now a rising flood of free -- much of it amateur [or pseudo-amateur] -- Internet pornography, just a simple Google search away. All you have to do is make a simple mistake in a search and the links to the most graphic, "hard core" porn sites will start to come up.

Thus, we are being lured into a world of graphical, aural and verbal stimulation, designed to pull us into an addiction to not only watching but participating in anything-goes action, and to eventually join the fun by (a) taking and posting public pictures of your "equipment" or adventures, or even (b) advertising in pop-ups on the same sites. And, since it is fairly easy to identify the location of a given PC on the net, even in very small territories, © invites will pop up for LOCALLY available, willing "partners."


--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Amadan



Posts: 1337
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,15:33   

Quote (sparc @ Aug. 23 2012,21:19)
Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,14:43)
     
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)

 Anyone know what he is talking about? "hate site initiative"? "suspicious associations tied in with porn"?


He is talking about the fact that our esteemed Lou once posted a link to photo's he had taken professionally that were hosted on his own website.  At least one of the pictures showed - gasp - a woman's naughty bits (above the waist only, I might add, but still devil's dumplings to be sure!)

Since then, he has taken several opportunities to state that this site associates with others offering pornography, or something like that.  Sounds libelous to me, anyway.

Anyone got a link to that great passage where KF talks at length about having to force himself to watch some hot girl on girl action?

According to his own Kairosfocus blog Mr. Mullings has quite some experience:
     
Quote
To see what that means practically, let us explore how a tidal wave of porn has been used to help pave the way for sexual orientation amorality, and for the acceptance of a radical redefinition of marriage to include the notion that a man can marry another man, or a woman another woman.

Let's put a face on the process (by virtue of fair use):




This lovely, fresh-faced smiling young miss (I gather she was precisely 18 at the time of this picture [and, no, I will NOT link the source that gives the context of that carefully cropped image . . . ]) would pass for the girl next door, and any young man would love to take such a beautiful young lady out on a date.
By cropping the picture he kept her private parts for himself but at the same time he could not resist to give us more details of course only to show his indignation:    
Quote
In fact, she is a rising "porn star."

The above image is a posed shot of her engaging in a lesbian sexual act, with details fully exposed.
To bad that  from the rest of his post it seems that he visited quite some of the linked sites    
Quote

(NB: The accompanying videos make it very plain that she is not just posing, but indulges for fun and profit in a wide range of on-camera sex acts with her "toys" [Betty Dodson's "self-love"], her girl friends [Dr Dodson's "partner sex" does not distinguish men/women or women/women] and her boy friends [in that order].  The girl friends also have linked sites. In these sites, some pictures and videos are accessible as free samples, and others on a subscription basis, i.e. the public are invited to become regular viewers of the ongoing addictive  story of the increasingly raunchy sexual adventures of this circle of porn actresses and their support men.
But it is not Gordon's mistake since:  
Quote
There is now a rising flood of free -- much of it amateur [or pseudo-amateur] -- Internet pornography, just a simple Google search away. All you have to do is make a simple mistake in a search and the links to the most graphic, "hard core" porn sites will start to come up.

Thus, we are being lured into a world of graphical, aural and verbal stimulation, designed to pull us into an addiction to not only watching but participating in anything-goes action, and to eventually join the fun by (a) taking and posting public pictures of your "equipment" or adventures, or even (b) advertising in pop-ups on the same sites. And, since it is fairly easy to identify the location of a given PC on the net, even in very small territories, © invites will pop up for LOCALLY available, willing "partners."

That really is quite impressive - typing all that with just his left hand.

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,15:46   

Don't know how Gordon Mullings' internet works, but the pop-ups I get are pretty much based on what I've been browsing and typing recently.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,15:54   

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki....tehouse

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,16:14   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 23 2012,15:05)
Barry Arrington continues his quest to push inconvenient questions off the first page. He has started what is at least the third thread at UD dealing with Upright Biped's semionic theory.

So he can start the whole thing over as if the links to TSZ don't exist, no one ever asked UB how his theory supports ID, whether he has evidence that the genetic code existed in its current form in the first replicator, or what the existence of red plastic balls has to do with evolution.

I predict that if anyone brings this up or posts links to the threads UB ran away from, they will conveniently stop posting after being warned of more serious forms of correction.

"Having finished typing his rather grandiose OP, Barry sensed a nagging feeling that something was wrong ..."
 
Quote
I take the following from an excellent comment UP made in a prior post.  UP lays out his argument step by step, precept by precept.  Then he arrives at a conclusion.  In order for his argument to be valid, the conclusion must follow from the premises.  In order for his argument to be sound, each of the premises must be true.

Now here is the challenge to our Darwinist friends.  If you disagree with UP’s conclusion, please demonstrate how his argument is either invalid (as a matter of logic the conclusion does not follow from the premises) or unsound (one or more of the premises are false).  Good luck (you’re going to need it).

Without further ado, here is UP’s argument:


--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,17:13   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 23 2012,08:18)
KF tries to bully from the pulpit:

 
Quote
WJM:

I hear you.

I take a different view.

If the train is heading for a bridge out, someone needs to warn.

Not least so some can get off before it is too late.

Failing that, I keep hearing the lesson of Ezekiel 3 and 33 in my head about the duty to warn.

That is why I speak above for record.

What is plain here is that we are seeing the exact sort of opening the door for nihilism and ruthless factions that evolutionary materialists are always so eager to tell us how dare you point to this as a problem for evolutionary materialism.

Indeed, it seems they think we are stupid or worse than that, to point this out.

But, the record, here with Petrushka as a poster child, is quite plain.

All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to remain or fall silent.

I will not be silent, and I will speak for record.

KF

PS: The astonishing thing is that, after it has been made quite plain by repeated cases how these folks habitually abuse people unwise enough to go to their hang-outs to try to discuss with them, they proceed to expect others to want to come there. Nope, I have no intention to wade into a swamp to get into a swamp mud wrestling match with those who — on plain track record — have the manners and attitude of a crocodile.

PPS: I think some of us need to beware of getting caught up in the Stockholm syndrome and the good-cop bad-cop game, thus, seeking/hoping for approval of determined, ruthless and nihilistic enemies. What is really going on is the marketing of evil: desensitisation to evil — now seen as “average” Internet behaviour, jamming out of objections and objectors through slander and strawman tactics, and conversion through manipulation.


And he wont be taking questions or engaging in dialogue.

"... it seems they think we are stupid or worse than that..."

Yes, much worse than that.

"I will not be silent, and I will speak for record."

Should be: 'I am a blowhard and a broken record.'

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,17:16   

Quote (dvunkannon @ Aug. 23 2012,07:14)
Quote (CeilingCat @ Aug. 23 2012,00:29)
 
Quote (sparc @ Aug. 22 2012,10:19)
     
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 22 2012,00:41)
Bonus:

         
Quote
If it had not been for C.S. Lewis, a Christian friend, the ID movement, and You Know Who, I might have condemned my children to a lifetime of darkness, as promoted by people like Richard Dawkins.


Here's my guesses for "You Know Who":

1) Liberace
2) Unnamed designer
3) Mr. Leathers
4) The guy that makes ladies blouses in men's sizes

HALP!


Gil's weeding was mentioned in the local press.

OMG!!  He maried a Gay!!!

I wonder what Janie Gay thinks about her husband's conversion from French teaching pianiste to Bibble thumping amnesiac?

Extra Free Bonus Gift - Check out the top of that page from the Tri City Herald for their view of "the blacks" getting together and doing a theater production of "The Amen Corner", by James Baldwin. If there was any play that Gil should have gone to see on his honeymoon, it was Amen Corner.

Who is You Know Who? Could it be....


Satan????

Or Stuart Smalley?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,17:19   

Quote
Internet pornography, just a simple Google search away. All you have to do is make a simple mistake in a search and the links to the most graphic, "hard core" porn sites will start to come up.

Gord's devastating evidence against Petruska consisted of a quote from someone else entirely.  So it's hardly surprising he accidentally searches for "hot teenage lesbian action" when he meant to look for "strawman soaked in oil of ad hominem".

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,18:04   

Quote (sparc @ Aug. 23 2012,13:19)
Quote (Freddie @ Aug. 22 2012,14:43)
     
Quote (REC @ Aug. 22 2012,14:27)

 Anyone know what he is talking about? "hate site initiative"? "suspicious associations tied in with porn"?


He is talking about the fact that our esteemed Lou once posted a link to photo's he had taken professionally that were hosted on his own website.  At least one of the pictures showed - gasp - a woman's naughty bits (above the waist only, I might add, but still devil's dumplings to be sure!)

Since then, he has taken several opportunities to state that this site associates with others offering pornography, or something like that.  Sounds libelous to me, anyway.

Anyone got a link to that great passage where KF talks at length about having to force himself to watch some hot girl on girl action?

According to his own Kairosfocus blog Mr. Mullings has quite some experience:
     
Quote
To see what that means practically, let us explore how a tidal wave of porn has been used to help pave the way for sexual orientation amorality, and for the acceptance of a radical redefinition of marriage to include the notion that a man can marry another man, or a woman another woman.

Let's put a face on the process (by virtue of fair use):




This lovely, fresh-faced smiling young miss (I gather she was precisely 18 at the time of this picture [and, no, I will NOT link the source that gives the context of that carefully cropped image . . . ]) would pass for the girl next door, and any young man would love to take such a beautiful young lady out on a date.
By cropping the picture he kept her private parts for himself but at the same time he could not resist to give us more details of course only to show his indignation:      
Quote
In fact, she is a rising "porn star."

The above image is a posed shot of her engaging in a lesbian sexual act, with details fully exposed.
To bad that  from the rest of his post it seems that he visited quite some of the linked sites      
Quote

(NB: The accompanying videos make it very plain that she is not just posing, but indulges for fun and profit in a wide range of on-camera sex acts with her "toys" [Betty Dodson's "self-love"], her girl friends [Dr Dodson's "partner sex" does not distinguish men/women or women/women] and her boy friends [in that order].  The girl friends also have linked sites. In these sites, some pictures and videos are accessible as free samples, and others on a subscription basis, i.e. the public are invited to become regular viewers of the ongoing addictive  story of the increasingly raunchy sexual adventures of this circle of porn actresses and their support men.
But it is not Gordon's mistake since:    
Quote
There is now a rising flood of free -- much of it amateur [or pseudo-amateur] -- Internet pornography, just a simple Google search away. All you have to do is make a simple mistake in a search and the links to the most graphic, "hard core" porn sites will start to come up.

Thus, we are being lured into a world of graphical, aural and verbal stimulation, designed to pull us into an addiction to not only watching but participating in anything-goes action, and to eventually join the fun by (a) taking and posting public pictures of your "equipment" or adventures, or even (b) advertising in pop-ups on the same sites. And, since it is fairly easy to identify the location of a given PC on the net, even in very small territories, © invites will pop up for LOCALLY available, willing "partners."

For a guy who allegedly comes across porn by making a "simple mistake in a search" gordo sure does know a LOT of details about what's in those videos and at the linked sites. Obviously that's because he watches them day and night at all hours of day and night and follows every link.

Notice that he says: "Thus, we are being lured into..."

No gordo, "we" are not being "lured" into anything. YOU are CHOOSING to watch porn videos. No one is forcing you to watch them.  

And hey gordo, that "graphical, aural and verbal stimulation" you feel when you watch all that porn is why you watch it, isn't it? You love the "stimulation" you get from watching porn, don't you? You're addicted to it, aren't you?

Is that one of the reasons you went bonkers for religion, to try to deal with your porn addiction? To fool yourself, your wife, your kids, and your murderous friends into believing that you're cured of your porn addiction? Obviously your religious spewage is just a facade and it isn't working for you because you're still watching porn, day and night, at all hours of day and night. And you sure are good at keeping a "record" of the details. Maybe you should try to get a job in the porn industry as a record keeper and detail explainer. That way you'd get paid to feel all that "stimulation", instead of having to spend money on porn site subscriptions.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,18:19   

KF, from pillowfort;

Quote
..I must again ask Dr Liddle if that is what she wants as the tone of her blog. KF


http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-430982

But don't ask here THERE.. on her blog, because she'll SEE it, and you'll get an ANSWER, and OTHER PEOPLE will see her answer, and you'll look (more) STUPID.

GEM, professional victim.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2012,19:08   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 23 2012,18:19)
KF, from pillowfort;

Quote
..I must again ask Dr Liddle if that is what she wants as the tone of her blog. KF


[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/for-record-petrushkas-irresponsible-deceit-at-tsz-in-regards-to-an-alleged-threat-of-banni

ng-made-by-me/#comment-430982]http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-430982[/URL]

But don't ask here THERE.. on her blog, because she'll SEE it, and you'll get an ANSWER, and OTHER PEOPLE will see her answer, and you'll look (more) STUPID.

GEM, professional victim.

What a hosepiece. And as much as KF monitors TSZ and here to report back on those that wound him so deeply--he saw the whole thing go down. Or he can look at sandbox.

He's seen his buddy's behavior.

Similarly, he knows Barry is the one that uses bullying and outing tactics-giving my name and employer, and letting his friends run wild with insults against me.

How hypocritical can one be?

Speaking of hosepieces, the coward named Joe has picked a good time to lay low. Post the link you used to insult Liddle on UD, and defend it Joe. Or are you embarrassed by your own childish behavior?

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 195 196 197 198 199 [200] 201 202 203 204 205 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]