N.Wells
Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Mar. 28 2015,11:59) | From my experience only those looking for a problem that does not exist are able to find one where the illustration requires all four (not two of four as behavior of matter does) requirements to qualify as "intelligent". |
Gary, as far as I can tell, and please correct me if I am wrong, you are completely deranged here.
JohnW @ Mar. 28 2015,11:06, said, Quote | Gary's "theory" requires elementary particles to have memory and learning ability | and you replied
That appears to be a lie on your part, given that your diagram is quite explicit about supposed behavior, particle physics, memory, and motor control.
You followed up with Quote | From my experience only those looking for a problem that does not exist are able to find one where the illustration requires all four (not two of four as behavior of matter does) requirements to qualify as "intelligent". |
However, no one in the last round of conversation has said that you claimed particles / matter had intelligence, just that they supposedly exhibit behavior which purportedly involves memory and motor control.
You are wrong* on the particulars of your claims about elementary particles and molecules, but that aside you are denying your own words and then attacking others for stuff they did not say. That's reprehensible, on all counts.
In what way does a neutron have an addressable memory? *Although electrons have velocity (and velocity is a vector, so you are being redundant in adding direction), in what way do they have a motor? You are just torturing words and meanings until you can get everything pigeon-holed some way, no matter how ridiculous, into your delusion.
|