MrIntelligentDesign
Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015
|
Quote (NoName @ Oct. 21 2015,08:44) | On the basis of your own argument, mistaken though it is, as to how science works, you fail. You lose.
Specifically, you have not shown which current hypotheses, theories or conclusions of science you are replacing. You have not shown that your work can, in fact, replace anything currently understood by science. You have not demonstrated that your notions have any explanatory power. You seem to be completely ignorant about what counts as an explanation.
Your work has not been accepted, by anyone, anywhere. So it has not replace any current theories or concepts. So, it needs nothing to replace it -- as far as science, even on your mistaken understanding, goes, it is a nothing. First it must show what it is attempting to replace. You haven't even attempted to do that (because you can't because you do not understand the fields involved). Then you must convince others. It's trivially easy to convince oneself. That is why your own feelings of certainty about your work are meaningless. You have to convince others. You haven't. For good reason -- your notions are vague, ad hoc, incoherent, self-contradictory, logically unconnected to each other as well as to reality. You're playing word games. Badly. Everything you have posted in this thread has been countered and refuted. You've run away from the challenges and sputtered nonsense in reply. You lose. You lose because you have nothing. You lie when you claim you have 'new discoveries', you lie when you claim you have 'science'. And we've proven it. |
YOU ARE REALLY CRAZY!
You post a lot but no logic, no science and no meaning!
Yes, I am replacing intelligence, evolution, etc...I've written 6 science books and I cannot give them here one by one...
YOU: a categorization scheme is not a definition. ME: That is stupidity! When you categorize X, you define X. For example, when your boss told you to turn on Win PC, you will never turn on Mac PC or TV or PSP4 or gameboy...
Thus, you are wrong.
YOU: Yours is not the default position. ME: So, even you but my new discoveries are in default position now since they talk about the real natural realm. Yours are fantasies and religions.
YOU: No math is required to distinguish things that are different.What math distinguishes polite behavior from rude behavior? Or are you incapable of detecting a difference because you have no math to support the distinction? ME: You are really crazy! All things are being done in math and the math is the set and sub-set but you don't use paper and pen for that but use your mind obviously, YOU ARE WRING IN EVERYTHING!
YOU: So if you cannot provide a replacement for that theory, you must accept it. ME: Yes, everything must have a choice and decision. You cannot stand neutral in reality since you either must stand to your concluded position or stand to other's position.
|