Richardthughes
![](http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt204/Kattarina98/richTARD_zpscd5e194f.jpg)
Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006
|
Double Mathgrrl:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-377307
Quote | 23
MathGrrl
04/14/2011
8:45 am Mr. Arrington,
Yet another separate thread, rather than addressing my arguments directly where I made them? One might easily get the impression that you are deliberately attempting to distract attention from your unsubstantiated assertion about me.
For your convenience, here is my pertinent comment from the previous thread:
– begin copy – Barry Arrington,
I will not retract an obviously true statement no matter how much you huff.
You made the following claim in reference to me:
QuiteID, she said the concept is meaningless (unless her friends are using it).
That claim is untrue. You cannot produce any support for it. Intellectual honesty requires that you retract it. – end copy –
It doesn’t require an enormous amount of courage to support one’s claims in an online venue, but it does require integrity to retract those that one can’t support. I await your response with interest.
24
MathGrrl
04/14/2011
8:47 am William J. Murray,
Mathgrrl said:
My conclusion is that, without a rigorous mathematical definition and examples of how to calculate [CSI], the metric is literally meaningless. Without such a definition and examples, it isn’t possible even in principle to associate the term with a real world referent.”
Not exactly. You are quoting what Barry Arrington said that I said. Here is what I actually said:
My conclusion is that, without a rigorous mathematical defintion and examples of how to calculate it, the metric is literally meaningless. Without such a definition and examples, it isn’t possible even in principle to associate the term with a real world referent.
http://www.uncommondescent.com.....ent-376790
Barry Arrington replaced the word “it”, which in context clearly refers to the numeric metric being discussed, with “[CSI]“. Whether deliberate or not, the result of that replacement was to give the impression that I meant something other than what I clearly said.
Incidentally, even with that additional confusion, there is no substance to Barry Arrington’s claim mentioned in my immediately previous comment in this thread.
|
-------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine
|