sledgehammer
Posts: 533 Joined: Sep. 2008
|
Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 01 2011,15:54) | Quote | Details? We don' need no steenkin details. It's not ID's job to match your pathetic demand for details. Your details stink anyways. |
Then why not just say that the "Almighty" did it in whatever the way it was done, even if that is consistent with evolution as described by science, and be done with it? After all, if they say that some method or other was impossible, they're directly implying that the "Almighty" couldn't have done it using that method, which contradicts what I thought was their base assumption. Or am I missing something here?
Henry |
Because that would mean that humans are just another animal, a filthy, stinkin' ape no less, with no Greater Purpose, and that would also mean that the Fall never happened, and therefore we didn't need to be Saved, and so The Scriptures might not be the Revealed Truth. Once you start down that slippery slope, it can only end in one place: the possibility that the atheists were right all along in that when we die, that's it, which can't possibly be the Truth because He is Risen. So all that other sciency stuff must be wrong. Simple as that. QED. End of story. Besides, everyone knows that Darwinism leads the innocent to Atheism and materialism, which is far, far worse than Islam, Naziism, and Communism combined, and so must be stopped at all costs.
-------------- The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny is alleviated by their lack of consistency. -A. Einstein (H/T, JAD)
If evolution is true, you could not know that it's true because your brain is nothing but chemicals. ?Think about that. -K. Hovind
|