stevestory
Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Quote | 541 AletaMay 2, 2016 at 12:09 pm kf writes,
Quote | You may be trying a baiting game to say see he is quoting Bible and can be tossed as spouting religious drivel.
In fact, you will see that I have primarily spoken to worldview, ethics/justice and policy issues i/l/o ideologies, agendas and implications.
Howbeit as you seem to want to know how I would find a specifically Christian basis that rules out attempted homosexualisation of marriage. |
The first two sentences are pretty incomprehensible to me. And no, I have no interest in knowing how you would provide a “specifically Christian basis that rules out attempted homosexualisation of marriage.”
My point is that lots of other Christians disagree with you, and thus would disagree with the conclusions you draw from the Bible verses you offer. Your argument is with them, not me, as I don’t consider the Bible an authority on anything.
| Quote | 542 PaVMay 2, 2016 at 12:15 pm Alaeta:
You haven’t responded to my last post. The resolution to the questions I’ve asked is this: law ought to legislate that which is morally good and right. Lawmakers do NOT have the right to contradict God’s Law, written in our hearts, because God is the Law-Giver, not man.
This, in fact, is the revolt we see taking place in society. And it will destroy us. We will have ‘hell’ to pay for.
| Quote | 543 AletaMay 2, 2016 at 12:32 pm PaV writes, Quote | Lawmakers do NOT have the right to contradict God’s Law, written in our hearts, because God is the Law-Giver, not man.
|
No, that is not a principle upon which our country is based. |
linky
Edited by stevestory on May 02 2016,14:47
|