Ftk
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 02 2008,13:02) | | Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Jan. 02 2008,12:23) | | Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 02 2008,12:04) | It's disgusting to you, Dave. But, copulation with man, woman (she's bisexual), beast, and relative is okay with Skatje. So, I'm not sure why Sal is being disgusting. Are those type of relationships "disgusting", and if so, why?
Discuss....
(sorry Assi, I swear I'll get to you by the end of the day.) |
1) It's quote-mining. See the entire post from which Sal quotes, and note that he does not give a link to that post. Perhaps that is because it starts out with this | Quote | | Allow me to first tell you that I personally do not have an interest in bestiality. I don’t support it being legal because I want to hump animals. |
And yet Sal's post implies that she would have a collared peccary as a fiance.
2) She's what, 16? Sal should stick to picking on grown-ups like ERV. Of course, I have no doubts that she can eviscerate Sal verbally. But she really shouldn't have to do that.
Sal is disgusting because he is a liar (quote-mining is lying) and because he feels that 16 yr old girls are fair game for "proving" his fantasies about atheists/darwinists/evilutionists. Read that again. Sal is disgusting. Please quit trying to switch the conversation to a discussion of why (or if) bestiality is disgusting. |
Dave,
1. Sal HT'd me...so that's not quote mining. I linked to Skatje's *entire* post. I'll make sure that where he HT'd me the link is accessible for those who don't read the post right before his.
2. It doesn't matter if Skatje wants to hump animals or not. The point is that it is completely moral to do so.
3. Sal implying that "she would have a collared peccary as a fiance" is humor meant to drive the point home. For the record, this is not the type of humor I advocate. But, it is interesting to note that your outrage is only displayed when you feel someone from my side has stepped over the line in this way. For instance, Erasamus's post yesterday was just as outrageous, yet not word from you on that one...interesting.
He wrote:
| Quote | RB and I'd like for you et al to consider the following:
The time interval between the Fall and the first time that Adam realizes that he can beat his meat by himself.
The brief interlude between the closing of the doors on the ark and the first time that Noah considered banging one of his daughters, for the first time.
The moments between the first greeting between King David and Johnathan, and the time required for David to reach a full, complete erection.
The number of times Joseph wondered just who in the hell his betrothed wife had been slipping around with.
How many calluses must have been on the palm of Jesus, the virgin haploid redeemer of mankind. Alternatively, did he never masturbate? Did Jesus sometimes consider breaking his own rules so that he might relieve a little pressure? If he didn't, can we say that he is truly human? |
Evidently RB (Reciprocating Bill?) helped him with that one and has no problem with it either.
The hypocrisy is rampant at this site.
The fact that Skatje is 17 is irrelevant. She is an extremely intelligent woman who has put a LOT of thought into these matters. She's in college and has probably given more thought to these issues than most adults. |
Also, Skatje is the daughter of one of the most ardent religion bashers. It only makes sense to consider the morals of his followers and offspring when considering what our future might look like without religion.
--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero
|
