MrIntelligentDesign
Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015
|
Quote (NoName @ Oct. 01 2015,08:21) | Utter nonsense.
Your paperclip example from page 1 is worse than absurd -- it smuggles in a "fact" that is anything but factual. One problem, one solution is, strictly speaking, wrong. Any problem has multiple solutions once we are outside the world of strictly formal systems. Yes, in decimal arithmetic using the arabic numerals, the 'problem' of 1 + 1 has only one solution, 2. But 1 + 1 is not really a problem, 2 is not really a solution, 1 + 1 = 2 is a definition.
Have you truly never looked at the range of problems involved in crafting a paperclip? In the range of solutions available at any office supply store? Or the range of possible solutions by which a person may deliver a single paperclip to their boss?
Your proposed "definition" of 'nature' is ridiculous. Using it to justify a separate "definition" for 'intellen' compounds the foolishness. The entire foundation is incoherent, wrong-headed, and entirely unhelpful.
Based on what we've seen so far, you're not even going to be up for an Ignobel. |
Please, before you post...can you clarify something?
Are you talking about ORIGIN and CAUSE & EFFECT?? Or are you just talking about solving problems only????
Are you referring to different kind of "intelligence" that is universal, scientific and better than my new discovery??? Do you have that?
When I said problem-solution, I am using it in the topic of ORIGIN and CAUSE & EFFECT since this is where I applied intelligence since the real intelligence is applicable there.
Of course, I knew that "One problem, one solution is, strictly speaking, wrong."
And
I agreed that "Any problem has multiple solutions once we are outside the world of strictly formal systems."
But I always used that in context of my new discoveries (of ORIGIN and CAUSE & EFFECT) since you cannot understand that problem-solution phenomenon if you will never follow my new discoveries...
"Have you truly never looked at the range of problems involved in crafting a paperclip? In the range of solutions available at any office supply store? Or the range of possible solutions by which a person may deliver a single paperclip to their boss?" --- ME: I don't get it..where did you base that?
"Your proposed "definition" of 'nature' is ridiculous. Using it to justify a separate "definition" for 'intellen' compounds the foolishness. The entire foundation is incoherent, wrong-headed, and entirely unhelpful." ME: You mean naturen...OK, I got it. Yes, naturen is always a symmetrical phenomenon and as I said that it has a range and I will share it later...
You knew, once you claimed that my new discoveries about real intelligence and categorization between naturen and intellen is wrong, you are thinking to yourself that you have an idea that is scientifically right...an alternative explanation, maybe.
GOOD. Maybe you are the one who could help me delete all my science books in Amazons and videos in Youtube...Let us compare. Let us see who is right..and please, don't just say that I am a fool without sharing your alternative explanation about the real intelligence...
If I'm wrong, FOR STARTER, then, tell me, WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE? I need an universal, obvious, simple, applicable to all X in the topic of origins and cause and effect, scientific, with experiments or empirical evidences...
LET US COMPARE...OK??
If not, I need your apology to me...choose..
Give me the real and universal intelligence in naturalistic science that is realistic or give me a sincere apology...
Which one is easy for you?
|