Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Larry Farflungdung's Blog

Pages: (6) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >

BWE Posts: 1902 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 18 2006,16:34    http://im-from-missouri.blogspot.com/ As in "you'll have to show me."  Oh the Irony. *edit* http://cartagodelenda.blogspot.com/2006/04/great-debate.html A few PT regulars mentioned by Larry in the last comment. -------------- Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered When wished on the morning star Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it Look what it's done so far The Daily Wingnut

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,01:18    Woo-hoo! I made Larry's List! Now to visit his blog... <rubbing hands in anticipation>

guthrie Posts: 696 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,02:00    As a matter of interest, do you reckon it would be best to ignore it completely, so that it withers and dies, or rather, joins the back scratching set up that are the pro-Id blogs? Or should scores of people join and put his no censorship proclamation to the test?

Stephen Elliott Posts: 1776 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,02:58    Quote (BWE @ April 18 2006,21:34) *edit* http://cartagodelenda.blogspot.com/2006/04/great-debate.html A few PT regulars mentioned by Larry in the last comment. I quite liked some of those "quotes". Made me laugh.

Chris Hyland Posts: 705 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,03:19    Quote Actually, what would be necessary is that large numbers of the bees and flowers possessing the corresponding beneficial mutations would miraculously have to simultaneously appear in the same place, because a single bee visits many flowers, and each flower is visited by many bees. Oh no, evolution has been disproved.

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,03:36    I'm composing a comment there right now (the real history of his banning).  I will be responding (over time) to his list of 19 excuses why Judge Jones's decision should be ignored.  It should be amusing.

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,06:16    Sorry, it's 18 excuses, not 19.  Though I'm sure he'll continue artificially inflating the number.

thurdl01 Posts: 99 Joined: Mar. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,06:27    Dang, I was hoping he had claimed it 19 and then only posted 18, just because one of his favorite misunderstands was the three rulings, one ruling thing.

The Ghost of Paley Posts: 1703 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,07:19    Quote As a matter of interest, do you reckon it would be best to ignore it completely, so that it withers and dies, or rather, joins the back scratching set up that are the pro-Id blogs? Well, if I ever get the time, I know I'm going over there. His "summary" of his experiences over at P's Thumb is complete nonsense. While I may not agree with ya'll on a lot of things, you do give a guy a chance to make his case, and I appreciate that. What gives him the right to pollute one of the last bastions of free expression? And then whine like a teenage girl with her cellphone privileges cut off..... -------------- Dey can't 'andle my riddim.

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,07:34    He has a thread in which he talks about why he thinks he got banned.  So far, it's the only one anyone has responded to (not including his test post).  Your perspective as stated would be appreciated, GoP. BTW, did you ever look at my revised posting regarding the vibrating shell theory?  It's the third post down onthe last page of the LUCA thread.  Just curious if you had any objections or clarifications.

The Ghost of Paley Posts: 1703 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,07:45    Quote BTW, did you ever look at my revised posting regarding the vibrating shell theory?  It's the third post down onthe last page of the LUCA thread.  Just curious if you had any objections or clarifications. Yeah, I'm way behind on that. I'll try to respond when I can. I got sucked into the gay debate like a rookie, and then I've got "Ripper" Brazeau to deal with..... -------------- Dey can't 'andle my riddim.

Arden Chatfield Posts: 6657 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,08:03    Hmmm... Could Larry's blog provide a new safe haven for disaffected refugees from UD? For example, can we expect, say, Josh Bozeman to start hanging around there? -------------- "Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,12:50    Quote While I may not agree with ya'll on a lot of things, you do give a guy a chance to make his case, and I appreciate that. What gives him the right to pollute one of the last bastions of free expression? And then whine like a teenage girl with her cellphone privileges cut off..... I get a chuckle out of the fact that Davetard has banned more people in a single day than PT & AtBC have banned in 2 years.

BWE Posts: 1902 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,17:49    0--> Quote (guthrie @ April 19 2006,070) As a matter of interest, do you reckon it would be best to ignore it completely, so that it withers and dies, or rather, joins the back scratching set up that are the pro-Id blogs? Or should scores of people join and put his no censorship proclamation to the test? That is precicely what I had in mind. I'm sorry I have been busy over the last few days. I notice he thought that my post was simply a personal attack on him. It was in fact a far more general comment than he interpreted it as. Kevin, well done. Very civil. I think his blog would be a good place to post definitive answers to his objections. Then we could simply point people who use his arguments to his blog. -------------- Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered When wished on the morning star Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it Look what it's done so far The Daily Wingnut

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,18:01    Thanks, BWE.  Really, I felt somewhat awkward posting my definitive refutations to his 12 now 18 objections where he might be banned.  It's a relief to have a place that he can respond freely.  Question.  Do people want me to cc my responses (I'll be crafting them one at a time) to this thread, or should I just link when I make a new argument?  It will take a while to get them all done, especially since I'm a Detroit sports fan (both my basketball and hockey teams have the best record in their respetive leagues and the playoffs start this weekend).

BWE Posts: 1902 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,18:26    I think links are appropriate so PT or AtBC posters can add their comments too. If it's particularly funny, or if the wind is blowing a certain way or if you feel like it I guess you should post your responses here. I think Larry is a sort of topic in and of himself anyway. This might be interesting if it catches on. A creationist websight where rational people can post. -------------- Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered When wished on the morning star Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it Look what it's done so far The Daily Wingnut

Bob O'H Posts: 2564 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 19 2006,19:18    Kevin (or can I call you W.?) - in the interests of irony, you should post under a different name each time. Bob -------------- It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

Arden Chatfield Posts: 6657 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,06:44    Quote (W. Kevin Vicklund @ April 19 2006,08:36) I'm composing a comment there right now (the real history of his banning).  I will be responding (over time) to his list of 19 excuses why Judge Jones's decision should be ignored.  It should be amusing. WKV: Very nicely done history of the Ballad of Larry Fafarman at the PT Corral -- that's exactly how I remember it all happening. I don't think LareTard will ban you, but his response is amazingly boneheaded. I think the part I'm most impressed with is his assertions that he basically had 'the right' to post under other people's names because he'd been banned. Kind of analogous to saying one has the 'right' to shoot a policeman because he was trying to arrest you... -------------- "Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

Arden Chatfield Posts: 6657 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,06:48    Quote (Bob O'H @ April 20 2006,00:18) Kevin (or can I call you W.?) - in the interests of irony, you should post under a different name each time. Bob Ooh, yeah, and post under the name of a different Confederate general everytime, like Larry did. Or maybe even better: post under the name of a UNION general every time. That should bug Larry, since he's a big Confederate apologist! -------------- "Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

Stephen Elliott Posts: 1776 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,07:09    Quote (Arden Chatfield @ April 20 2006,11:48) Quote (Bob O'H @ April 20 2006,00:18) Kevin (or can I call you W.?) - in the interests of irony, you should post under a different name each time. Bob Ooh, yeah, and post under the name of a different Confederate general everytime, like Larry did. Or maybe even better: post under the name of a UNION general every time. That should bug Larry, since he's a big Confederate apologist! Oooooh! Naughty! I hope you folks aren't seriously encouraging someone to behave in a way you find reprehensible in somebody you disagree with.

The Ghost of Paley Posts: 1703 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,08:47    Quote Kind of analogous to saying one has the 'right' to shoot a policeman because he was trying to arrest you... Or the "right" to sneak in a movie theater 'cause Hollywood movies all suck anyway. -------------- Dey can't 'andle my riddim.

BWE Posts: 1902 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,13:35    Oh come on. Reprehensible? Any way I just left a couple of posts over there here and here at the end -------------- Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered When wished on the morning star Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it Look what it's done so far The Daily Wingnut

Arden Chatfield Posts: 6657 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,13:54    Quote (Stephen Elliott @ April 20 2006,12<!--emo&) Oooooh! Naughty! I hope you folks aren't seriously encouraging someone to behave in a way you find reprehensible in somebody you disagree with. Certainly not. That Would Be Wrong. -------------- "Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,16:26    Quote (W. Kevin Vicklund @ April 19 2006,11:16) Sorry, it's 18 excuses, not 19.  Though I'm sure he'll continue artificially inflating the number. Quote NOTICE -- I just made a major addition to my original post: I added another item to my list, item #19. I also made two minor significant additions: (1) on item #18, I mentioned the amicus brief submitted by 85 scientists; and (2) I added a sentence to the end of item #3. Whenever I make significant changes in my posts, I will leave notice in the comment section. Larry Fafarman Thursday, April 20, 2006 6:34:45 PM Can I call 'em or what?

Wesley R. Elsberry Posts: 4991 Joined: May 2002 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,18:48    Can someone tell me what sort of moral defective it takes to believe that he is banned, but does his utmost to continue posting anyway? -------------- "You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,20:35    Someone with a martyr complex. Hey, Wesley, perhaps you could clear things up for us.  What actions did the admin take on Jan 26 when four commenters (thordaddy, M, Larry, and pro from dover) were found to be using the same IP address?  We know that Rule 6 was enforced on the address itself (at least temporarily), but did any of the four actually get banned, and how did the bans (if any) get enforced?  Basically, we're trying to figure out why Larry that he was personally banned.  And your emphasis on the word "believe" tells me there's more to the story than what I can research independently. What effect did the revelation that the IP address was a major AOL gateway have on the actions taken? This may delve into proprietary and private information, so I understand if you can't answer.

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,20:43    Oh, this is a beauty!  Caught him in the act of discovering egg on his face, I think. Quote Posted by Larry Fafarman on April 21, 2006 01:19 AM (e) This is a test Larry just posted the above comment in the Darwin Day in New Mexico thread.  Trying to sneak it past us.

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,20:52    I think I just spent the last 5 minutes laughing uncontrollably.  Larry has got to be wondering if I ever sleep. "Hi, Larry!"

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,21:01    "Larry Fafarman.  Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time." "Do you know him? Is he still banned?" "Of course I know him.  He's me."

W. Kevin Vicklund Posts: 68 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: April 20 2006,21:55    Well, it's gone now.  But my response is still up. Interesting to see how Larry responds to this latest development.  Probably put some sort of blame on me.

Pages: (6) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard