Sealawr
Posts: 54 Joined: Feb. 2008
|
Quote (Doc Bill @ Sep. 09 2012,11:31) | Quote | “I’ve asked some really good lawyers and nobody knows the answer,” Becker said. “One lawyer told me it’s as long as he wants to take. It could take a year, two years.” |
Really good lawyers, eh? What, unlike himself or the flacks he normally hangs around with?
Really, really, like, good, lawyers.
I assume the judge could rule against Coppedge with no comment. Simply, "no, go away."
For anyone out there with experience in these kinds of wrongful termination cases, is Coppedge typical? |
Yes, the judge could rule against Coppedge with a simple "judgment for defendant."
If the plaintiff or defendant requests a "Statement of Decision," then the judge must prepare a written opinion goign into some detail. Most judges know how to write these to bulletproof them on appeal.
Under California law, the judge must render a decision within 90 days after the case has been submitted.
Reading between the lines in the linked article, Becker has continued to submit post-trial briefs, essentially re-setting the 90 day clock.
I suspect that's why JPL is not filing a response to his latest--they don't want to re-set the clock any more.
The judge also has the power to prohibit further filings. I do not know why the judge has not done so in this case. Most judges I know would have cut Becker off by now and rendered the decision.
-------------- DS: "The explantory filter is as robust as the data that is used with it." David Klinghoffer: ""I'm an IDiot"
|