Annyday
Posts: 583
Joined: Nov. 2007
|
| Quote | 2
Bugsy
12/04/20073:46 pm
I agree wholeheartedly.
Not only should atheists be disallowed for teaching any subject related to the bible, non-Nazis should be disallowed from teaching about Nazism, and capitalists should be disallowed from teaching about Communism.
Only true believers get to talk about given beliefs. It’s the only way to give everyone a fair shake. |
| Quote | 3
digdug24
12/04/2007
3:47 pm
Indeed. All the so-called ’scientists’ who discredit the evidence for Bigfoot should not be allowed to teach a cryptozoology class. Someone like the new DI fellow Michael Medved would be infinitely better at such instruction because he believes it. Anyone else will just show their preconceived biases.
|
| Quote | 4
Bugsy
12/04/2007
4:02 pm
The literal existence of angels and of psi haven’t been given fair shakes in mainstream academia, either. We need to put more enthusiastic people in the chairs currently occupied by materialist scientists, to make sure that our experiments turn out the right way. |
Here, BA77 strikes back.
| Quote | 8
Bugsy
12/04/2007
5:10 pm
“What gives you the audacity to say that God definitely did not have a hand in creating such stunning complexity we see in life?”
I’ve said no such thing. In fact, you seem to be toeing the materialist line by denying the existence of angels and psi. I’d think someone interested in quantum mechanics and ID would know better than to lump entire fields into the rubbish bin because they don’t comply with orthodoxy, but that’s exactly what you’ve done.
I ask you to reevaluate your incorrect, materialistic premises before you go over what I’ve written. Only then can it become apparent that what I mean is not at all what you think it is, and that I’m asserting a legitimate place for ID while decrying the canning of a distinguished astrophysicist. |
| Quote | 9
digdug24
12/04/2007
5:12 pm
Hear hear bugsy.
Born^Again, why are you discrediting the work of honest scholars in the field of cryptozoology? There are lots of these folks out there and academia pooh-poohs their hard evidence and says it is not ’scientific’. i see lots of interesting parallels between cryptozoology and ID. As far as angels go, I think we can make a design inference about their existence. Dembski certainly agrees. A question I have often considered is ‘how much CSI would an angel have?’ Certainly it must be much more than a human being. This would give us a first order approximation at how much has been lost since the Fall.
I for one am glad that you are standing up for God and the argument regarding design. ID stands to gain immeasurably from not being wishywashy about the identity of the designer. This is a problem around here, for sure. |
| Quote | 10
Bugsy
12/04/2007
5:22 pm
To deny angels and psi is to deny the bible and the holy spirit. |
Nullasalus disagrees ...
| Quote | 12
Bugsy
12/04/2007
5:37 pm
I don’t think you belong here at all.
|
And then Luskin intervenes, deleting all posts by both Bugsy and Digdug.
| Quote | 6
Casey Luskin
12/04/2007
5:38 pm
The evidence released yesterday shows undeniable evidence that Dr. Gonzalez faced a hostile work environment and was denied academic freedom becuase he supports intelligent design. Regardless of whether you agree with ID, open minded people should be abhorred at what took place at ISU.
Bugsy and Digdug24 provide us with excellent examples of how Darwinists cope with evidence of their academic intolerance towards ID: they change the subject and make comments about angels and cryptozoology, etc. To see a discussion of the issue of ID and the identity of the designer, see [URL=http://www.discovery.org/a/4306. |
--------------
"ALL eight of the "nature" miracles of Jesus could have been accomplished via the electroweak quantum tunneling mechanism. For example, walking on water could be accomplished by directing a neutrino beam created just below Jesus' feet downward." - Frank Tipler, ISCID fellow
|
