sparc
Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007
|
Quote (CeilingCat @ Oct. 25 2017,11:37) | rvb8 starts a reply with this line: "News, let a little reality in please, this post is slightly less well researched than an AIG science piece."
KF replies with just about every trope and cliche in his inventory: Quote | RVB8, your habit of using invidious comparisons to Creationists not present to defend themselves is doubly offensive. First, the invidious comparisons, which send a not so subtle message of pushing ID into a boat in which even the same Creationists recognise it does not belong — yet another case of your speaking in insistent defiance of regard for truth you know or should know (and for correction). Second, it is an utter disgrace to do drive-by smears of those not present to defend themselves, regardless of how you may view them. I suggest that it is high time that you stop such behaviour, especially as it is part of the toxic trifecta of fallacies: red herrings led away to strawman caricatures soaked in ad hominems, to set them alight to cloud, confuse, poison and polarise the atmosphere for discussion. In the case of Wikipedia, it is a clear case of radical relativism at work on the domain of knowledge and reveals that the attitude might and manipulation make ‘truth,’ ‘right,’ ‘rights,’ ‘knowledge,’ etc is an open invitation to domineering, amoral, nihilist factions who then entrench themselves and ruthlessly oppress those they target; through agit prop tactics and the underlying cultural marxist agenda to wreck our civilisation. It is a capital public manifestation of the failure and bankruptcy of evolutionary materialistic scientism and its fellow travellers. KF |
Did he miss anything? I don't see "mafia ninja thugs attempting to pollute my bodily fluids" in there. Anything else?
I have a theory, which is mine, that if KF ever succeeds in getting every one of his cliches into a single reply, ID will implode with a force that will suck all of Intelligent Design into a chaotic self-referential maelstrom of incredulity, indignation, poor reasoning and impotent self-righteousness that would actually be little different from it's condition today. So let 'er blow, I guess.
Link
P.S. Of course, ba77 and News, in their 1997 paper on quantum yeast, also proved that in addition to a critical cliche mass, a reply must also be at least fifteen pages long in order to successfully implode. |
Montserrat is an island surrounded by water, big water, ocean water.
-------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."
- William Dembski -
|