RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < ... 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,11:52   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 03 2013,11:42)
Over at UD, Joe is about to get posting privileges soon. Niwrad already dedicated him his very own thread titled "Joe scores".

This will encourage Joe to become even more of a prick - okay, that will take some effort.

This reminds us that evolution does not always proceed from simple to complex.

We used to be treated to posts by Dr.Dr.Dembski hisself. Then it was Barry. Now it's KF and niwrad. Eventually the forum will be handed over to BA77 and Joe G. Genetic entropy, fo' sho.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,11:58   

Quote (olegt @ April 03 2013,12:52)
Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 03 2013,11:42)
Over at UD, Joe is about to get posting privileges soon. Niwrad already dedicated him his very own thread titled "Joe scores".

This will encourage Joe to become even more of a prick - okay, that will take some effort.

This reminds us that evolution does not always proceed from simple to complex.

We used to be treated to posts by Dr.Dr.Dembski hisself. Then it was Barry. Now it's KF and niwrad. Eventually the forum will be handed over to BA77 and Joe G. Genetic entropy, fo' sho.

who is the bottom rung

my guess is byers but I have to say i wonder if Gordon Eliot Mullings of Manjack Heights Montserrat hasn't already claimed the bottom of the barrel

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,12:28   

LOL

Joe and nested hierarchies vs and actual evolutionary biologist

Boom goes the dynamite.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,12:39   

Quote (OgreMkV @ April 03 2013,12:28)
LOL

Joe and nested hierarchies vs and actual evolutionary biologist

Boom goes the dynamite.

LULZFEST.

But I doubt Joe will pay. Judging by his house, he doesn't have $10k.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,12:54   

Quote (OgreMkV @ April 03 2013,10:28)
LOL

Joe and nested hierarchies vs and actual evolutionary biologist

Boom goes the dynamite.

Beautiful.

Quote
Ya see evolutionism is OK with any pattern

Ok, you don´t seem to be lying, you seem to be a genuine idiot.


--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,13:21   

An iconic poster boy of the Dunning-Kruger effect - he is sooo confident to have grasped the concept of nested hierarchy he might just show up at an empty parking lot before a qualified referee to cash in.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Driver



Posts: 649
Joined: June 2011

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,16:14   

Losing $10,000 and so having to move to a smaller parking lot, further away from the mosque :(
But... his own thread at UD! :)

On balance, good times for Joe?

--------------
Why would I concern myself with evidence, when IMO "evidence" is only the mind arranging thought and matter to support what one already wishes to believe? - William J Murray

[A]t this time a forum like this one is nothing less than a national security risk. - Gary Gaulin

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,16:27   

Quote (Driver @ April 03 2013,16:14)
Losing $10,000 and so having to move to a smaller parking lot, further away from the mosque :(
But... his own thread at UD! :)

On balance, good times for Joe?

PotW.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,16:39   

At first, I was wondering where Joe finds the time to post all over the internet between fixing toasters and tumbledriers, but then I remembered he has got a choice of three oneliners conveniently linked to three function keys on his keyboard.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 03 2013,16:59   

We can see what happened when KF was given privileges to start threads over there.  Namely, he uses it as his soap box, whines incessantly about perceived attacks on his person, regularly turns commenting off and channels the loudspeaker in the ceiling.

If I was at all a religious person I think I would be praying hourly for Joe to get the same privilege, just to have a single chance to see the final meltdown.

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,02:45   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 03 2013,17:42)
Over at UD, Joe is about to get posting privileges soon. Niwrad already dedicated him his very own thread titled "Joe scores".

Hmmmm ... !click! ... OK, left side of the screen, Joe Scores yadda yadda yadda. Right side of screen, very pretty girl on dating site ad. OK, concentrate: Joe scores yadda yadda .... mmmm she sho' is pretty ... Joe Joe yadda ...

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,06:05   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ April 04 2013,09:45)
 
Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 03 2013,17:42)
Over at UD, Joe is about to get posting privileges soon. Niwrad already dedicated him his very own thread titled "Joe scores".

Hmmmm ... !click! ... OK, left side of the screen, Joe Scores yadda yadda yadda. Right side of screen, very pretty girl on dating site ad. OK, concentrate: Joe scores yadda yadda .... mmmm she sho' is pretty ... Joe Joe yadda ...

If by "scoring" you mean getting all excited over internet porn, then I can see your point.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,06:12   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 04 2013,12:05)
Quote (Soapy Sam @ April 04 2013,09:45)
   
Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 03 2013,17:42)
Over at UD, Joe is about to get posting privileges soon. Niwrad already dedicated him his very own thread titled "Joe scores".

Hmmmm ... !click! ... OK, left side of the screen, Joe Scores yadda yadda yadda. Right side of screen, very pretty girl on dating site ad. OK, concentrate: Joe scores yadda yadda .... mmmm she sho' is pretty ... Joe Joe yadda ...

If by "scoring" you mean getting all excited over internet porn, then I can see your point.

If the Joester finally scored, I'm pleased for him, but it's hard to concentrate on his doings when UD keep pushing pretty girls in my direction ...

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,06:32   

What I meant was Joe never scores in real life, so excessive posting and sneaking in a graphic pic at The Skeptical Zone are his pathetic substitutes.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,09:00   





Want to have some fun? Feel free to remove the text and add your own.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,09:30   

Quote (The whole truth @ April 04 2013,15:00)




Want to have some fun? Feel free to remove the text and add your own.

Drs Dunning and Kruger check back through their old case studies ...

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,17:20   

Quote (JohnW @ April 03 2013,12:54)
Quote (OgreMkV @ April 03 2013,10:28)
LOL

Joe and nested hierarchies vs and actual evolutionary biologist

Boom goes the dynamite.

Beautiful.

Quote
Ya see evolutionism is OK with any pattern

Ok, you don´t seem to be lying, you seem to be a genuine idiot.

Still going, so funny!

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,17:56   

Did you notice that on that thread, Joe is commenting both as JoeG and frisbee_kid? Maybe JoeG is the Christian, and frisbee_kid is the Muslim in his split personality.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,18:46   

Quote (Richardthughes @ April 04 2013,23:20)
   
Quote (JohnW @ April 03 2013,12:54)
   
Quote (OgreMkV @ April 03 2013,10:28)
LOL

Joe and nested hierarchies vs and actual evolutionary biologist

Boom goes the dynamite.

Beautiful.

     
Quote
Ya see evolutionism is OK with any pattern

Ok, you don´t seem to be lying, you seem to be a genuine idiot.

Still going, so funny!

Good grief! I once tried to 'discuss' nested hierarchies with him at UD (though I'm no expert). Just one long "ya see"-fest. Set theory? Statistics? Likelihood? Confidence? Whassat?

Andy complains that his misconceptions go back two months! I've seen the same conversation going back to 2007. Just click on Joe's username, it's the first thing that comes up. Pay up Joe.

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2013,19:09   

IIRC, Zachriel tried to explain nested hierarchies to Joe, and after what seemed weeks Joe was on the brink of understanding. And then - crash! the iron curtain fell down, and Joe balked at the last step. It seems to be a psychological problem: If Joe understood nested hierarchy, his whole identity would crumble like CAEK.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,03:14   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 05 2013,01:09)
IIRC, Zachriel tried to explain nested hierarchies to Joe, and after what seemed weeks Joe was on the brink of understanding. And then - crash! the iron curtain fell down, and Joe balked at the last step. It seems to be a psychological problem: If Joe understood nested hierarchy, his whole identity would crumble like CAEK.

I've found this resource that clears it all up.

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.co.uk/2012.......cs.html

Joe (for 'tis he)          
Quote
The clade is not constructed based on ancestor-descendent relationships, those are assumed. And ancestor-descendent relationships form a non-nested hierarchy- see Eric B Knox, "The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics", Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (1998), 63: 1–49

The clade is not constructed on something that forms a non-nested hierarchy. Which is therefore .... well, OK! You infer phylogeny, you don't assume it. And you try multiple characters. If you keep getting similar trees, a process must be patterning that sharing of multiple characters in 'tree-like' manner. Now what could that be...? He quotes Knox incessantly. Yet if Knox tried to explain it to him, he'd instantly become a "shit muncher".  :D Get Knox to adjudicate, Joe.

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,06:23   

Joe has been unable to learn for six years that it's clades, rather than species, that form a nested hierarchy. His umpteenth appeal to Knox's paper reveals this fact for the umpteenth time.

Species of course do not form a nested hierarchy (as defined in set theory): a mother species does not contain the two daughter species in Knox's example. However, the clade including the mother species and the daughter species contains the clades that include the daughter species alone. This is trivially true by definition. It's elementary. Joe, however, has so few functioning brain cells that he can't wrap them around this simple concept.

Bonus track: Joe being clueless 2009 and in 2010.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,08:10   

Quote (olegt @ April 05 2013,06:23)
Bonus track: Joe being clueless 2009 and in 2010.

Love the oldies. They always have a catchy tune.

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,09:13   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 04 2013,15:56)
Did you notice that on that thread, Joe is commenting both as JoeG and frisbee_kid? Maybe JoeG is the Christian, and frisbee_kid is the Muslim in his split personality.

And he may resort to John Paul, ID Guy, Jim, or whatever other user names he uses.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
socle



Posts: 322
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,13:40   

Quote (OgreMkV @ April 03 2013,12:28)
LOL

Joe and nested hierarchies vs and actual evolutionary biologist
Boom goes the dynamite.

This has probably been noted before, but I haven't been following Joe's blog lately.  

It's interesting to contrast Joe in 2006, in a post entitled "Why Set Theory is irrelevant when discussing Nested Hierarchy (sic)":
Quote
That is why when you are talking about nested hierarchy and someone tries to divert the attention to set theory they are up to nothing but deception.

with Joe now, at the Skepticink thread:
Quote
Nested hierarchies are constructed by making sets. Those are specified, well-defined sets in a specified well-defined order.

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,14:03   



Edit:
Over at UD, Joe crows victory! I guess that means his future posting privileges are down the drain.

Edited by Kattarina98 on April 05 2013,22:07

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,15:27   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 05 2013,14:03)


Edit:
Over at UD, Joe crows victory! I guess that means his future posting privileges are down the drain.

Nothing like leaving out the facts:

"Hey Barry, can I sue him?"

No, because he's proposed judges and is even fine with Joe picking them. Please persue this Joe, you losing $10k will make me laugh.

ETA: Joe is too cowardly to link what actually happened.

Edited by Richardthughes on April 05 2013,15:28

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,15:33   

Might as well post this gem from Denton (pre Destiny Denton)

Quote
There is another stringent condition which must be satisfied if a hierarchic pattern is to result as the end product of an evolutionary process: no ancestral forms can be permitted to survive. This can be seen by examining the tree diagram on page 135. If any of the ancestors X, Y, or Z, or if any of the hypothetical transitional connecting species stationed on the main branches of the tree, had survived and had therefore to be included in the classification scheme, the distinctness of the divisions would be blurred by intermediate or partially inclusive classes and what remained of the hierarchic pattern would be highly disordered.- Denton, “Evolution: A Theory in Crisis” page 136 (X, Y and Z are hypothetical parental node populations)


--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Andy Schueler



Posts: 43
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,16:42   

Quote (Richardthughes @ April 05 2013,15:27)
Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 05 2013,14:03)


Edit:
Over at UD, Joe crows victory! I guess that means his future posting privileges are down the drain.

Nothing like leaving out the facts:

"Hey Barry, can I sue him?"

No, because he's proposed judges and is even fine with Joe picking them. Please persue this Joe, you losing $10k will make me laugh.

ETA: Joe is too cowardly to link what actually happened.

I agree, I so hope that he does try to sue me :D

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 05 2013,16:43   

Quote (Andy Schueler @ April 05 2013,16:42)
Quote (Richardthughes @ April 05 2013,15:27)
 
Quote (Kattarina98 @ April 05 2013,14:03)


Edit:
Over at UD, Joe crows victory! I guess that means his future posting privileges are down the drain.

Nothing like leaving out the facts:

"Hey Barry, can I sue him?"

No, because he's proposed judges and is even fine with Joe picking them. Please persue this Joe, you losing $10k will make me laugh.

ETA: Joe is too cowardly to link what actually happened.

I agree, I so hope that he does try to sue me :D

Welcome, Andy!

Enjoy this thread ;-)

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < ... 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]