Dr.GH
Posts: 2333 Joined: May 2002
|
Quote (Zachriel @ Oct. 06 2015,14:19) | Quote | computerist: There is absolutely no conflict with ID and “complex physical states” as a possibility. CPSD – Complex Physical States Design, if you will, is totally consistent within the scope of ID, IMHO. |
Time for an update to the
Tardheap of History
Quote | bCSI, Biological Complex Specified Information BPB, Biological Probability Bound CPSD, Complex Physical States Design CSI, Complex Specified Information DFSCI, Digital Functionally Specified Complex Information EF, Explanatory Filter FAI, Functional Algorithmic Information FCT, Functional Coded elemenT FIIRDS, Functional Incredibly Improbable Random Digital Strings Fits, Functional Bits FSC, Functional Sequence Complexity FSCI, Functionally Specified Complex Information FSCO/I, Functionally Specific, Complex Organisation and associated Information GSP, Genetic Selection Principle ID, Intelligent Design IDC, Intelligent Design Creationism IR, Irreducible Complexity LCCSI, Law of Conservation of Complex Specified Information PI, Prescriptive Information SpEnt, Specified Entropy TARD, The Argument Regarding Design TE, Theistic Evolution UPB, Universal Probability Bound UPM, Universal Plausibility Metric |
So what does it mean to be on the Tardheap of History? Certainly, it doesn't mean it is thrown away, like on the Ash Heap of History, because Tard always gets recycled with simple mutational changes rearrangements of the letters. |
Amen!
|