RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

    
  Topic: theistic evlolution, failure< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
skeptic griggsy



Posts: 5
Joined: Nov. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 27 2006,07:54   

Theistic evolution is an oxymoron, because it conflates natural selection [causalism] and telology .As Dr. Weisz notes:"End states are consequences, not foregone conclusions." Before that he notes""Causalism denies foreknowledge of terminal states,preordination,purposes ,goals and fixed fates." Therefore , there is an contradiction between causalism and telology such that theistic evolution is just obscurantism . Now to obviate that contradiction, theists such as Russell Stannard propose a two category classificatin of origins[ natural selection] or contingency and creation[teleoligy- God] or necessary being; but as Malcolm Diamond and Kai Nielsen note in their philosophy of religion books , that is a circular argument. Causalism does not need a divine intruder to work. That is just god of the gaps! :)    :angry:  :O

--------------
Fr. Griggs rests in his Socratic ignorance and humble naturalism. Logic is the bane of theists.

  
  1 replies since Nov. 27 2006,07:54 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

    


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]