RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

  Topic: Evolution Question #2, SETI, do you hear what I hear?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Wesley R. Elsberry

Posts: 4928
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2006,04:00   

SETI research proceeds as an ordinary design inference, not the rarefied design inference that ID advocates propose in their conjectures about biological systems.

Of course, the objection is just one of the ensemble of old, bogus antievolution arguments:

Claim CI190:
SETI researchers expect that they can recognize artificial signals, proving that there is an objective criterion for recognizing intelligent design.

"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

  9 replies since Nov. 03 2006,10:13 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]