Joined: Dec. 2003
First of all, I thank you for the courtesy of replying to me. I am a hostile critic of your work on these emotionally charged issues. I've not been exactly kind in some of my comments about your work or the things you have said (which you see all over ARN), and I am thus all the more grateful for the favor of your replies.
I recognize I'm a guest here at your website, thus I will try to keep my postings on this thread to a minimum unless of course you wish me to elaborate or debate more.
I may post verbosely at ARN on your paper. Post your responses wherever you please if you are so inclined to do so. The questions however that need clarification from you I will post here. My goal now in posting here, is to specifically ensure that I represent and understand your position accurately.
I know you'd rather debate Bill Dembski rather than me, so with that in mind, I will not try to be too much of a distraction to you at your website.
Again, thank you for the favor of your responses. If you really want me to engage your paper I will, otherwise, I will limit my participation on this thread.
I'll post at ARN to let everyone know that you have responded to me now. Thank you.