Joined: Oct. 2015
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 15 2015,20:46)|
|Quote (Otangelo @ Nov. 15 2015,19:40)|
|I am always keen to learn. It depends however, from who, and if i regard the information given as trust worthy, and the inferences drawn of the evidence compelling. |
The same question goes to you. Are you willing to permit the evidence to lead wherever it is ? Even if it is towards the oposit direction that you wish ?
Define a trustworthy source? Do you consider Nature trustworthy? You must since you used it.
Let me ask you a question. Name one ancestor in the maternal line from between 60 and 100 generation prior to yourself. If you can't, then how do you know you are human?
I guess we can be happy that you didn't cut and paste the entire FORUM POST. Tell, us, what is the nature article that is referred to in that post? Have you read it? Or is "Admin" a trustworthy source? If so, why?
Please explain, in your own words, how this article supports an ID inference.
OK, hit us with the evidence. Do what no ID proponent has ever done, hit us with the evidence.
[/quote]Or is "Admin" a trustworthy source? If so, why?[/quote]
Just to clarify, i am the Admin of reasonandscience, which is my personal virtual library.