Joined: April 2007
|Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 08 2019,09:08)|
|Quote (Bob O'H @ Oct. 07 2019,11:54)|
|Quote (fnxtr @ Oct. 04 2019,15:46)|
|Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Oct. 04 2019,13:37)|
|Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 04 2019,12:48)|
AxelOctober 4, 2019 at 10:23 am
I find it absolutely incredible – and I mean, ‘literally’ incredible – that there has been all this hoo-haa about dating the Shroud of Turin, when the image on it is a photogrpahic negative ! I mean who would have thought in the days before photography of even TRYING to imagine what a photographic negative, i.e. reversing light and shade on ANY IMAGE, never mind a shroud, would look like?! In a month of Sundays. The way negatives look now, as well as that on the Shroud, surprise me no end. A fault of my imagination, I know, but still and all…. Yet the highest levels of education are evidently no proof against such common, everyday madness. The banality of idiocy makes a nice bookend with the banality of evil, doesn’t it ?
Game. Set. Match.
Give him a hand
Is that a one handed Golf clap?
It’s a wall full of the Devil’s playthings.
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr
"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin