|Jerry Don Bauer
Joined: Nov. 2012
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Dec. 02 2012,09:27)|
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Dec. 01 2012,09:16)|
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 30 2012,21:32)|
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 30 2012,15:19)|
If I understand this correctly, according to CSI, a protein with odds of random construction of 3X10^34 is not designed.
Still waiting on this one. It's very important.
I have to revise this slightly.
Is a protein that has a CSI of 1/(2.2E66) designed or not?
Come on Jerry, I'm serious. This is important.
1) You waffle between the 10^50 and 10^150 value.
2) You say it is not designed.
Those are really the only two choices. Well, you'll probably choose not to answer, which I totally understand.
Hi Jerry. Can you answer?
I'm not positive why you haven't read (or maybe you don't comprehend, which is OK) what I have stated already on this.........Borel's UPB was the starting point, but the accepted UPB in ID is now Dembski's which is 10^-150 or 1:10^150.....that works out to 500 bits of information....
Just convert your math accordingly...is it over 500 bits? It is designed......
Is it UNDER 500 bits? Design cannot be determined.......IOW, it may or may not be designed, but I don't have the information to determine that it IS.