Joined: Sep. 2009
|Quote (Jerry Don Bauer @ Nov. 25 2012,10:04)|
|[quote=Dr.GH,Nov. 21 2012,21:41]|
... ID does not seek to replace evolution (We ARE evolutionists) ...
So you are an "evolutionist", and yet you dismiss all transitional fossils as somehow not valid, and I suspect that no fossil will ever satisfy you.
Does that mean that your idea of evolution does not include transitional fossils at all, and in fact no transition is needed? Then how did your kind of evolution happen?
Your argument seems inconsistent (and I was tempted to say dishonest).
Barry Arrington is a bitch.