Joined: June 2006
Years later and -- pretending for a moment it's all about the science -- I still don't see the point of ID.
"This doesn't seem likely" is still not positive evidence of interference, tinkering, or front-loading of anything by anyone. They still conflate "We don't know yet" with "Goddidit".
Even if you could somehow pretend ID is a scientific idea, what possible use could it ever be? "Welp, this bit looks designed. Moving on..."
How does pretending bipedalism (or GULO damage or nylonase production or...) was a gift from somewhere, change how we deal with it?
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad
"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin