Joined: Dec. 2006
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 01 2012,14:50)|
|Quote (stevestory @ Dec. 01 2012,14:18)|
|So now multiple scientists at multiple fora have told him 1) ID is wrong, but 2) Unlike ID, your stuff isn't even wrong, it's incoherent, we can't even make out what you're trying to say, you simply can't express yourself clearly enough for anyone to know what you're talking about.|
Please explain how you know that these relatively few "scientists" who bother to protest are even qualified to judge a theory like this?
From my experience, scientists who are able to fairly judge it are OK with the theory. Those who trash theory prove to have not even read it, and in other ways show that they are too biased to be an unbiased judge.
Name some names, Gary. I doubt there are scientists who could find your writings coherent (let alone your theory meaningful).
Oh, and congratulations on being able to program in Visual Basic 6. I bet you can also recite the alphabet! Attaboy!
If you are not:
please Logout »