Joined: Oct. 2012
|Quote (Woodbine @ Nov. 26 2012,22:44)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 27 2012,04:33)|
|And I sure cannot afford to fund my own research that was to redo all the incomplete/misleading experiments that have been published.|
To which incomplete or misleading experiments are you referring, Gary?
Instead of another 30 pages of rubbish why don't you select one of these published papers and explain why you think it's misleading and/or incomplete?
We'd love to see your expert analysis.
Here's what I reference in the theory, because of being better than nothing:
S Ohno, Birth of a unique enzyme from an alternative reading frame of the preexisted, internally repetitious coding sequence., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81:2421-2425, 1984.
All you need is the title and maybe abstract of the paper so you can boast about how wonderful the theory you follow is, while I need to know the exact mechanism including any sensory systems that may be involved.
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.