Joined: Oct. 2012
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 24 2012,10:04)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 22 2012,11:07)|
|If you cannot better explain the very basics of molecular and cellular intelligence, then you are unqualified to speak for these areas of science where some knowledge of David Heiserman (and others) is required..|
Why should we explain something that we don't think even exists.
"If you can't give me a better explanation for the invisible dragon in my garage, then why should I even listen to you?"
When YOU provide evidence that such things even exist, then we can evaluate the effectiveness of your notions in explaining them. But I don't think that molecular and cellular intelligence exist, unless you change the word "intelligence" to mean "any action as a result of any change in the environment of the thing". Which appears to be what you are doing.
Understanding this theory makes it much easier to understand the work of scientists who actually study molecular, cellular, algorithmic and electronic intelligence.
If all this is against your religion then you are best to continue to help trash science, for religious gain.
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.