Joined: May 2006
The crux of the matter is that science needs to explain how known intelligence began from unintelligent causes known to exist prior to the existence of intelligence.
IDiots, including Gary, want to use unknown intelligence to explain what is known to exist and arise apart from evident intelligence, as well as to explain intelligence itself. Because it's easy to assume that intelligence could do just about anything, and they don't see why they should have to use causes known to exist when the effect occurs.
There is no correspondence between science--or any meaningful efforts for discovery--and any claim that mysterious and unverifiable intelligence caused life and intelligence, as that is merely a simplistic assumption. Science is in the business of matching up known causes with known effects, while IDiots merely model assumed causes as producing any effects they wish.
Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy