Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 22 2012,00:57)|
|Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Nov. 22 2012,00:30)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin]Popper philosophy and your religion based conclusions to try getting out of having to address the model which references to:|
David L. Heiserman
[URL=http://www.beam-wiki.org/wiki/Heiserman @ _David_L.)
Arnold Trehub, especially Chapter 9, Page 158, Fig 9.3
You have no better model to show, nothing at all to help pioneer developing fields. Instead stomp on them so they are not taken seriously like they should have been right along.
Gary, can you not see how disclaiming falsifiability and also calling for critics to attempt to falsify your work is inconsistent, if not contradictory?
Then YOU explain how intelligence works using a high school level model that applies to all known intelligence levels (molecular, cellular, multicellular)! Show circuit and algorithm, along with evidence that your model came from established cognitive science experts.
Oh, we've seen how you link to experts Gary: "Look, he used the same phrase as me!"
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine