Joined: Aug. 2006
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 19 2012,15:28)|
|Quote (JohnW @ Nov. 19 2012,17:09)|
|Gary, until you've shown that the natural world - not your code - works this way, this is just an assertion.|
So was the model/theory of Charles Darwin and any other theorist who ever lived.
Your argument is still irrelevant.
Charles Darwin presented evidence. Evidence from the natural world. And he showed how his theory explained that evidence. And he, and subsequent scientists, found new evidence which further supported the theory, and failed to find any evidence which contradicted it.
It's called science, Gary. You may have heard of it.
Meanwhile, what have you done? Written a VB program. Asserted, without showing evidence and without engaging real-world data in any way, that this program supports, even proves, your notion that molecules are intelligent. That's it.
It's like claiming that World of Warcraft proves the existence of magic.
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG