Joined: Aug. 2006
|Quote (fnxtr @ Nov. 19 2012,14:50)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 19 2012,14:34)|
|Quote (JohnW @ Nov. 19 2012,16:18)|
| † † |
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 19 2012,14:14)|
|You're still just trying to get out of having to know what you are talking about.|
If you have a better model and theory to explain "intelligent cause" then present it. Otherwise, your question is scientifically irrelevant.
No-one has to explain "intelligent cause" until you've shown that it exists, Gary. †You haven't done that.
Maybe this one might jog your memory:
Really? You still don't understand that your model is not evidence? Really?
Your art imitates life. So what?
Gary, until you've shown that the natural world - not your code - works this way, this is just an assertion.
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... ¬†The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG