RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (621) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 5373
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2012,17:42   

Quote (Woodbine @ Nov. 18 2012,15:38)
† †
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 18 2012,21:04)
Considering how in some areas of science no good deed goes unpunished, I seriously do not have the time or resources to go over this all over again for you.

Yes you do. Proof of that will come when you land at yet another forum posting exactly the same stuff as you've been doing for the last 5 years.

† † †  
After such a successful crusade to drive people like me out of science and into poverty, just be thankful my phone service is still on and Iím online.

You were never in science in the first place, Gary.

Gary, every place you arrive and present your work you are met with the exact same criticisms....

1) You are incoherent - that means people cannot understand what you are talking about.

2) Your work is incoherent - that means people cannot understand what it means.

3) You do not understand the nature of a scientific theory - having a badge from Planet Source Code does not in any way prove otherwise.

4) You steadfastly refuse to make any predictions based on your theory that people can test to see if the theory is useful.

Do you see the pattern here, Gary?

Now, you can do one of two things.

A) Take the criticism seriously (seeing that everywhere you go it's the same).

B) Cry about how the man is keeping scientific mavericks like you down; and then find another forum to post your stuff - rinse and repeat.

My money's on B.

I see your pattern, and know the drill. Itís the usual political rhetoric used to stop politically inconvenient scientific theory from being written. Thatís why I have not been wasting all my time trying to please ones with fingers in their ears at forums like this one, and can be found (among other places) on Planet Source Code where they (surprise!) only care how well the code/model/theory performs.

So, as Demosthenes might say: I am not here because I need your sympathy! I am now here because you need mine!

The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

  18610 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (621) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]