Joined: June 2009
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 17 2012,10:59)|
|Quote (sparc @ Nov. 16 2012,15:16)|
This would be the situation in a flask inocculated with a single E. coli cell susceptible to T2 phages.
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 16 2012,09:04)|
|Quote (sparc @ Nov. 15 2012,23:22)|
Gary, what does theory say about the distribution of intelligence in a bacterial clone? Is theory assuming that all cells contain the same amount of intelligence?
As long as they were well isolated from external information from wild colony conjugation the molecular level intelligence of the clones would be essentially identical.
What does your theory predict will happen if a single T2 phage is added to the culture?
|But the cellular intelligence is the part it develops during its lifetime and depends on environment, resulting in tumblers, swarmers, or even sessile, resulting in very different cellular intelligence circuits.|
Thankfully I found another more normal question to work on:
After a phage inserts itself into the host genome to be replicated the molecular intelligence memory size increases. There are then additional molecular intelligence subsystems included. It makes sense that there is more intelligence there, even though the recent gain could later become harmful.
Where the phage is deactivated it's taken out of the molecular circuit, molecular intelligence is then the same as before. Where the phage starts quickly replicating inside, the molecular intelligence and/or (without help from host systems is) phage protointelligence continues to rise. The intelligence will not drop until the phage destroys the host.Where the phage is a beneficial mitochondria that just took up residence in a cell, the molecular intelligence of the cell increases, and the cellular intelligence would be more robust and responsive from the extra energy (but not have more cellular intelligence unless it also adds more cellular level circuitry/subsystem to its schematic).
Still talking about the life cycles of the invisible unicorns but nothing about how they explain the world better than a world without invisible unicorns.