Joined: June 2007
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 16 2012,05:19)|
|1, the PSC award banner (that is only for award winners) is there so that no matter how well you think you're doing (making it seem that you know better than everyone else) the how-to community most knowledgeable in what else is around already made it clear what they think about it, and you cannot change that. |
The award is for 'superior coding', Gary. Not 'superior science'. Just because your little application might be well written bears no relevance as to its scientific merit.
|And 1b it's my mission to make sure they are proudly represented and credited not sidelined in a forum where some will always instead demand respect of some pompous tribunal, which even needs to judge theory with recent controversial philosophy to get the answer they want.|
They don't need your help, Gary. In fact I would suggest that Planet Source Code would rather not be seen to endorse what (ever) it is you are selling.
|2 only helps show how out of touch with the rest of the planet your opinion is, which leads to 3,4,5 not being worth answering. Reality is, that programmers, school board members, artists, politicians and others found this theory useful for answering questions they had in regards to the scientific merit of the Theory of Intelligent Design and what a theory is and is not.|
If this is true then you will have no problem in providing those answers here! But you won't.
|I already explained how in Kansas the US laws and ethics combines to add an unresolved public hearing requiring a number of years after that to even begin to resolve, and all that takes the outcome of this theory very seriously. It's a learning thing, at the citizenry level, that the law of the land wants to happen too. Modern day in the name of science invading your forum like this, then makes our forefathers proud.|
Delusional gibberish capped off with a dose of Glenn Beck-style patriotism.
You're not a birther by any chance are you, Gary?